Ok troll. I know it's not about cricket now. I don't need to waste anymore time on you, or the thread.yeah I'm the emotional one
yikes
Last edited:
Ok troll. I know it's not about cricket now. I don't need to waste anymore time on you, or the thread.yeah I'm the emotional one
yikes
I was talking about cricket until you decided to launch a 2 paragraph personal tirade . . .Ok troll. I know it's not about cricket now. I don't need to waste anymore time on you, or the thread.
Evidence?Mr. Miyagi vibes....
Pure speculation.Evidence?
Not really. As you see Jayasuriya was almost head to head with Gilchrist as the second opener. With his bowling, fielding and captaincy skills (people forget he has a similar win percentage to Jayawardane, whom regraded as one of the best cricket tacticians around. Jaya was not far behind with his wits on the field), and provides serious or even superior skill set to Gilchrist. It was once Watson and Sharma emerged, Jayasuriya's place was doubted.That's what I'm saying: Gilchrist was the universally unquestioned pick for that spot at the time. It was after that that Dhoni really made his case for greatness.
Exactly, neither was Gilchrist.Yes, indeed, which is an excellent record but decidedly not Steve Smith levels of statistical outlier.
Ignore the tests it's a land slide for MSDIgnore Tests completely and the comparison is a close one, maybe we should just do that to make certain people ITT happy. Because if you include Tests at even a small weighting it's not even close
Jayasuriya. Average difference of about half arun and SR difference of 3, easily can be attributed to difficult conditions Jaya played at home.Other than Tendulkar, name a single ODI opener from Gilchrist's time who was better or equally good?
The fact is that the game in Gilchrist's time was built around having an anchor opener and an aggressive opener. Gilchrist was the best aggressive opener. Tendulkar was the best anchor (mostly because for an anchor he had a very aggressive strike rate).
The game has changed since then and opening has become a lot easier.
NoFairly certain that if you translate over era's bevan's sr is very comparable to dhoni's. Bevan could hit boundaries and clear the fench with ease, you don't make a 150 sr 180 against an attack of murali, wasim, kumble and vaas if you can't clear the fence, it was more that his era required him to rely on 1's and 2's with the occasional boundary. Take bevan in a modern context and he would have no trouble adapting.
how?Add tests it is lesser, but still a land slide.
Don't get triggered.how?
With Dhoni-favourable estimates I can see
Tests: Gilchrist >> Dhoni
ODIs: Dhoni > Gilchrist
T20Is: Dhoni > Gilchrist
i.e. not a landslide
wotDon't get triggered.
lol wowJayasuriya. Average difference of about half arun and SR difference of 3, easily can be attributed to difficult conditions Jaya played at home.
A small example of above : when India won the CB series in 2008 in Aus , he had asked the team to celebrate in a moderate manner and don't behave like minnows.I like dohni, and aside from the occasional troll, I think his captaincy is way undervalued. He was not a tactical genius, but he just seemed to exude calm, that relaxes others in your team so they perform better. He didn't seem to incite divisions in his team. We never got to see Gilchrist enough, but I'd imagine he have been a captain in a similar vein.