Can you beat for the cricket guru title?

[marc71178]

I know what he's talking about, but don't have time to psot so won't answer.

 

[Burpey]

bodyline?

 

[JASON]

bodyline?

Nope.

 

[Burpey]

i think this question has killed this thread , Jason

 

[JASON]

OK clue -

One of the Teams was England !!

 

[biased indian]

Shakoor Rana J.Miandad M.Gatting Fielding Captain

Test 1987 pakistan Vs England at Faislabad

 

[JASON]

Shakoor Rana J.Miandad M.Gatting Fielding Captain

Test 1987 pakistan Vs England at Faislabad

Correct !! Well done ! Your turn to post next question.

Shakoor Rana (Umpire) and Gatting were the main parties at conflict !!

 

[Somerset]

Correct !! Well done ! Your turn to post next question.

Shakoor Rana (Umpire) and Gatting were the main parties at conflict !!

Ah, should've recognised that incident, it was all the "......"s that made the statement a little difficult.

 

[JASON]

If Biased Indian does not post a question , then consider this question. Else it can be ignored.

Question

Only 3 Cricketers in the history of Test Cricket have held catches of their own Team Mates while fielding as substitute fielders for the opposition .
Who are they ?

 

[Somerset]

If Biased Indian does not post a question , then consider this question. Else it can be ignored.

Question

Only 3 Cricketers in the history of Test Cricket have held catches of their own Team Mates while fielding as substitute fielders for the opposition .
Who are they ?

Hmmm...very good question..

Can I ask if these any of these three players' catches were performed after World War I?

 

[JASON]

Hmmm...very good question..

Can I ask if these any of these three players' catches were performed after World War I?

I see you are using a subtle technique to change the format of this thread to the one like the other thread !!

None were performed after WWI , because cricket rules and substitution etc. became pretty much well regimented after the 19th Century.

 

[Somerset]

I see you are using a subtle tachnique to change the format of this thread to the one like the other thread !!

None were performed after WWI , because cricket rules and substitution etc. became pretty much well regimented after the 19th Century.

Me changing the format? Never...

Just wanted to check so it wasn't a trick question in a match during the 20th century.

 

[honestbharani]

Doesn't look like Honestbharani is going to post a question !!

Damn !! I am getting fed up with these guys who turn up and post answers but never bother to post a question !!

I am really sorry, Jason. I was at college and it was time for a class.

 

[JASON]

I am really sorry, Jason. I was at college and it was time for a class.

no worries, Mate. you can post next question when you can !!

 

[JASON]

Anyway for those interested, here's an image of Gatting - Shakoor Rana confrontation !!

 

[biased indian]

which player holds the unique record of playing max no. of ODI without getting a man on match on any occasion??

 

[slugger]

ahh which new zealander has scored two centuries and on both occasions 3 other nz batsmen have scored a century in the same innings.

 

[biased indian]

ahh which new zealander has scored two centuries and on both occasions 3 other nz batsmen have scored a century in the same innings.

pls read the Rules slugger
and
Welcome to Cricketweb

 

[Burpey]

which player holds the unique record of playing max no. of ODI without getting a man on match on any occasion??

michael kasprowicz?

 

[JASON]

ahh which new zealander has scored two centuries and on both occasions 3 other nz batsmen have scored a century in the same innings.

Oi ! Oi ! Slugger hold it right there !!

It was Biased Indian's turn to post question and since he had not posted one I posted a question above (which can now be ignored since BI has posted a question !! ) .

But how come you ignore all the above and post a third question !!

Read the rules, on first page Mate !!

When no one has posted a question, you can post your question. But now BI's question takes precedence (even if it were a tad late !!).