King_Ponting
International Regular
I'd have to agree with that (only cause of my WA bias)Linda said:Hussey over Katich/Hodge any day of the week.
I'd have to agree with that (only cause of my WA bias)Linda said:Hussey over Katich/Hodge any day of the week.
Hello, thats the predominant reason he's in over *coughdirtytraitorcough* Katich.King_Ponting said:I'd have to agree with that (only cause of my WA bias)
Thats the oneLinda said:Hello, thats the predominant reason he's in over *coughdirtytraitorcough* Katich.
Too late for that. Mike is already 30.Monty said:i think that the hussey brothers could be the next waugh twins
ramprakash rivals hick in terms of unfilled talent at international level IMO.marc71178 said:Ramprakash benefitted from there not being any decent competition for the spot, must be the only explanation for him playing so many Tests.
thats probably one of the reasons. i do think though that bevan wasnt really respected by his team mates or the selectors, they've obviously not really warmed up to him(or particularly his attitude)like they have with someone like hayden and its really explains why he was kicked out of the ODI side at the first available opportunity.marc71178 said:Ramprakash benefitted from there not being any decent competition for the spot, must be the only explanation for him playing so many Tests.
Katich has played for hampshire on and off for the last 3 years and has done pretty well certianly better than clarke did at the same county i think he has played for durham aswell. Average of around 50 i think, an average of 49 so far for hampshire this yearvic_orthdox said:Has Katich played County Cricket before, and if so, how was he performed? Especially in comparison to the other members of the Aus middle order, plus Hodge and Hussey. I'd just like to know.
all that about Hussey may be true but and i agree that he should be picked in the near future, but i'll wait until the ashes concludes & see if Hayden especially fails to let him open. But has some people right said we could have another langer situation with Katich probably going to open the batting. But time will tellkwigibo said:If Hussey is going to be picked, it should be now. His record in county cricket is overwhelming, and it's what, 4 years till the next ashes tour? I've always been a firm believer in horses for courses (India wouldn't have been so difficult had they picked some more spin players in 2001, of which there are more than a few in Australia, believe it or not), and Hussey feeds off the English greenery.
As for Bevan, he has deserved a test recall, should still be in contention really, had an unbelievable pura cup season for Tasmania, after about 5 mostly remarkable seasons for NSW. The short ball weakness got him dropped, but he fixed that by learning to hook and pull very effectively, which is why he's still scoring tons of runs in first class cricket in both hemispheres.
not really mike hussey still has 8 years in him and dave has 10 years so they could still do it remember mark started in 94/95 and retired in 2003 thats 8 yearsFaaipDeOiad said:Too late for that. Mike is already 30.
This is true and in addition, Bevan may not have gotten a disproportionate number of opportunities but he had enough. For a while he played like a champion but then the run of low scores and dismissals outside off-stump started and that was that.Ramprakash benefitted from there not being any decent competition for the spot, must be the only explanation for him playing so many Tests.
Mark started in Jan 1991, mate. He was 25 at the time.not really mike hussey still has 8 years in him and dave has 10 years so they could still do it remember mark started in 94/95 and retired in 2003 thats 8 years
Hussey won't play until he is 38.Monty said:not really mike hussey still has 8 years in him and dave has 10 years so they could still do it remember mark started in 94/95 and retired in 2003 thats 8 years
Oh, I agree. But it's not for lack of ability or form. He could average 200 next season and he wouldn't get a look in. His dropping from the test team was for a justifiable reason, but he remedied that in FC cricket at home and abroad. His ODI dumping wasn't justified, Ostensibly it was about age but they replaced him with people the same age. It was really because they just don't like him. If he had averaged in the low 40's/30's like everyone else in the ODI team, he'd probably have been dropped last century. But like people here have said, it's probably his own fault, if he had ingratiated himself like a lot of other players he might still be there, even if he was just a blatant arsekiss like, say, Langer (I've nothing against Langer, but a browner nose I've not seen). They couldn't wait to give Elliott a shot last year, who is the same age, who was similarly found out in the late 90's, who was similarly prolific at FC level. Let's face it, Bevan's out for good, but it has precious little to do with what he does with a cricket bat in his hand.sledger said:bevans time has almost certainly passed now imo..
it would be awsome if he didSirBloody Idiot said:Hussey won't play until he is 38.
I can't see him staying around till he's 38!Monty said:not really mike hussey still has 8 years in him and dave has 10 years so they could still do it remember mark started in 94/95 and retired in 2003 thats 8 years
of course not i would guess he'll be playing until he is about 35.marc71178 said:I can't see him staying around till he's 38!