-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Bevan = Hussey????
- Thread starter Slats4ever
- Start date
aussie
Hall of Fame Member
look at this interesting comparison between Bevan & Hussey:
After 10 ODI innings Runs Ave/ Runs per innings Scoring rate 50s/ 100s
Michael Bevan 345 57.50/ 34.50 77.88 1/ 0
Mike Hussey 387 129.00/ 38.70 95.55 3/
Has Mr. S.Rajesh said ''The table above how the stats for Hussey and Bevan compare after ten innings for each. The incredibly high number of not-outs for Hussey obviously props up his average, but he has scored more runs at a better scoring-rate than Bevan had at the corresponding time in his career. If Hussey can perform at even 70% of his current form over the next four-five years - already 30, it's highly unlikely his career will stretch much more than that - Australian cricket will be well served."
After 10 ODI innings Runs Ave/ Runs per innings Scoring rate 50s/ 100s
Michael Bevan 345 57.50/ 34.50 77.88 1/ 0
Mike Hussey 387 129.00/ 38.70 95.55 3/
Has Mr. S.Rajesh said ''The table above how the stats for Hussey and Bevan compare after ten innings for each. The incredibly high number of not-outs for Hussey obviously props up his average, but he has scored more runs at a better scoring-rate than Bevan had at the corresponding time in his career. If Hussey can perform at even 70% of his current form over the next four-five years - already 30, it's highly unlikely his career will stretch much more than that - Australian cricket will be well served."