Battle of the Australians

[Jono]

Keith Miller

 

[Anil]

Chappell for me. It's extremely hard to seperate these two, and both are in the top 5 Australian players of all time, so it shouldn't be this one-sided.

agreed...chappell for me as well....

 

[luffy]

Greg Chappell

 

[Slats4ever]

keith miller

 

[Johnners]

Chappel

 

[Salamuddin]

Chappel

Greg Chappell...how can you look beyond the brains behind the underarm incident

 

[BoyBrumby]

Miller for me. Genuine all-rounder who would've been selected for the test team on either discipline.

 

[Johnners]

Greg Chappell...how can you look beyond the brains behind the underarm incident

Pretty Easy, take a quick look at his record, averaging 50+ in an era with so many great fast bowlers is no mean feat.

 

[R_D]

Keith Miller....

From what i've read about him.. he could've had even better figures at test cricket level if he took cricket more serious. Not that he has bad figures or anything.

 

[aussie]

really can't separate them, so i'll just go Chappell

 

[nightprowler10]

13-6 to Miller.

Battle of the Australians: Second Semi-final

Shane Warne

Test: 140 matches, 2958 runs @ 16.61 | 685 wickets @ 25.25
ODI: 194 matches, 1018 runs @ 13.05 | 293 wickets @ 25.73

vs

Glenn McGrath

Test: 119 matches, 631 runs @ 7.51 | 542 wickets @ 21.55
ODI: 227 matches, 109 runs @ 3.89 | 335 wickets @ 22.60

 

[Dasa]

McGrath.

 

[luffy]

Glenn McGrath

 

[marc71178]

Warne.

 

[Mister Wright]

Glenn McGrath

 

[Johnners]

Warne - Knocked out Waugh who was my tip to win it.

 

[Slifer]

Easily Glenn Mcgrath

 

[vic_orthdox]

Warne. Again, for his impact on the psyche of Australian cricket.

 

[Jono]

McGrath

 

[R_D]

McGrath

I haven't followed the battle from start but wasn't Bradman inlcuded because of the thought that he'd problay win ? or did he get knocked out ?