Battle of the Australians

[pasag]

McGrath

 

[Johnners]

Ponting

 

[BoyBrumby]

Can't go past McGrath really; his longevity is remarkable for a seamer. Shows his enormous desire & professionalism. For all his pantomime pommy-bashing I suspect he's a pretty decent cove too.

 

[nightprowler10]

16-5 to Pidge.

Battle of the Australians: Quarter-final 4

Steve Waugh

Test: 168 matches, 10927 runs @ 51.06 | 92 wickets @ 37.44
ODI: 325 matches, 7569 runs @ 32.90 | 195 wickets @ 34.67

vs

Shane Warne

Test: 140 matches, 2958 runs @ 16.61 | 685 wickets @ 25.25
ODI: 194 matches, 1018 runs @ 13.05 | 293 wickets @ 25.73

 

[PhoenixFire]

Really, really tough one. Warne just edges it.

 

[BoyBrumby]

Ouch. Titanic. Warney probably the more gifted player, but I have a massive soft spot for Waugh. I think tho, on balance, Warne has been more crucial in Australia's ascent to world domimantion.

 

[oz_fan]

Really tough battle. I'll go with Warne.

 

[Perm]

These tough battles just keep coming, Shane Warne.

 

[Mister Wright]

Steve Waugh

 

[Slifer]

Steve Waugh. Not that i actually think he's a better cricketer than Warne. But this battle shouldnt be this one sided.

 

[cameeel]

Warne - Just

 

[Son Of Coco]

Warney

 

[aussie tragic]

Steve Waugh

 

[Johnners]

Steve Waugh

 

[nightprowler10]

6-4 to Warne thus far. By no means a one sided battle.

 

[luffy]

Steve Waugh

 

[Matt79]

Warne

 

[shortpitched713]

Waugh.

The fact that Warne's a total d-bag might have something to do with it.

 

[bagapath]

shane

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

Warne, just.