Battle of the Australians

[nightprowler10]

14-12 to McGrath then. Here we go with the final.

Battle of the Australians: Final

Keith Miller

Test: 55 matches, 2958 runs @ 36.97, 7 100s, 13 50s | 170 wickets @ 22.97, 7 5-fers, 1 10-fer

vs

Glenn McGrath

Test: 119 matches, 542 wickets @ 21.55, 28 4-fers, 28 5-fers, 3 10 fers
ODI: 227 matches, 335 wickets @ 22.60, 9 4-fers, 7 5-fers

 

[Matt79]

ppffhhh! Miller easily. Warne would have provided a contest. Miller averaged 22 with the ball, which compares pretty favourably to McGrath's 21, when you add in the differences in batting averages. And Miller was a much better entertainer.

 

[luffy]

Keith Miller

 

[cameeel]

McGrath

 

[Johnners]

McGrath

 

[chaminda_00]

McGarth

 

[vic_orthdox]

Keith Miller.

 

[oz_fan]

Miller

 

[Slats4ever]

Keith Miller. Simply cos I forgot to vote for warney last round and he deserves to be here. Besides Miller's a better player nyway.

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

Tricky. McGrath.

 

[Magrat Garlick]

McGarth

 

[Mister Wright]

Glenn McGrath

 

[a massive zebra]

Miller.

 

[Dasa]

Miller.

 

[Pratters]

McGrath

 

[bagapath]

keith miller a lesser bowler compared to mcgrath. but his explosive batting more than compensates the difference with the ball.

 

[R_D]

Keith Miller.

nightprowler10.. i think you might have counted my vote twice but looks like Mcgrath was winnign anyway..

 

[Dravid]

Glen

 

[aussie tragic]

Miller easily

 

[shortpitched713]

Miller. Pretty clear cut case of allrounder beating specialist for mine.