Red
The normal awards that everyone else has
I don't disagree except we just don't have any depth any more. When everyone knew there were one (potentially two) opening spots and one or two middle order spots up for grabs, success became paramount, because if we reward last year's full Shield season, we end up with Harris, Wade, Pukovski, Maddinson, SMarsh, Bancroft. Bancroft and Harris just don't look test standard to me. I think Harris can probably Chris Roger himself if he gets a bit smarter over the next few years, but he and Bancroft looked woeful in England.No, picking players in form is bad rationale. Anyone can fluke some runs in quick succession. Nathan Hauritz hit two tons in a row once (Tim Paine must be jealous - it's taken 13 years for him to match that total). How often has picking batsmen "in form" actually worked out for us? What is there to suggest that picking players in form is actually an effective way to select teams? It rewards merit....and then they get dropped 6 tests later and we pick some other in form player. May I remind people for the 200th time that Smith hadn't scored a FC ton for over 12 months when he got recalled. Tbf, I don't really care that much about people like us using this rationale, but I'd like to think full time selectors who should have access to a wealth of information can do a bit better than going onto cricinfo and throwing darts at the top 5 leading run scores. Batsmen don't magically get much better or worse in the space of 5 months. The selectors should be able to sit down in October before the shield season starts and identify, based on stuff like previous run scoring and the dreaded eye test, and work out who they have in mind for a test spot, and some ****er scoring two tons in a row while another ****er fails two times in a row shouldn't throw things into chaos
The two batsmen that I would like to see in the Aust team within two years are Pukovski and Patterson. I also want to see Renshaw make some runs, because I rate him. If I was identifying talent I'd pick these three. But you can't pick these three guys if they aren't making Shield runs, or if they're injured. In two to three years (assuming Warner's retired) I'd like to see:
Renshaw
- ? -
Pukovski
Smith
Patterson
Labuschange
These guys aside, I don't see anyone else in the Shield deserving, and if you don't reward runs made, what else can you work on if the ones you rate aren't making runs or are injured?