Archived [18/10/06] : Battrick

[Jamee999]

that with ITS or without ITS jamee?

Without.

 

[brenoevo]

Going alrite in todays Cup match against an ok Div 4 team. They won the toss and elected to bat on my Flat pitch. Bowled them out for 242 in the 50th over. Westhead again taking another five for, thats 3 in 3 matches this season. I am now currently...

End of Over 7: 48-0, runrate=6.86, reqrunrate=4.53 (242-10)
Hewitt 4-0-24-0
Jayasuriya* 30 (24 balls)
Kennedy 18 (18 balls)

So the longer these two can stay together the greater my chances will be of winning the match.
How is everyone else, whose games have started, going in there Cup matches?

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

Chasing 259 to win on Hard and Fast, if De Beer stays in I should win. I've got a few good bats coming in, none are as good as him but they can all make scores. It's going well so far.

End of Over 8: 48-0, runrate=6.00, reqrunrate=5.02 (258-7)
Ferrell 4-0-24-0
De beer* 30 (31 balls)
Heads 13 (19 balls)

 

[ash chaulk]

And that's the end of the match. Viveash won by 10 wickets.
Avondale Allstars 144-10


Viveash 148-0
Elvins 76*, Wainwright 67*

 

[ash chaulk]

Si Hunter (801054)
RH Batsman, RM Bowler, respectable batting form, respectable bowling form, changeable
A steady player with mediocre leadership skills and worthless experience.

Plays For: Viveash
Nationality: Australia
Age: 17 Years Old
Battrick Rating: 3,285
Wages: £1,017 p/w

Stamina: worthless Wicket Keeping: respectable
Batting: worthless Concentration: abysmal
Bowling: worthless Consistency: worthless
Fielding: abysmal


a keeper who wastes $1000 in wages bye bye

0 ITS used

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

End of Over 21: 121-0, runrate=5.76, reqrunrate=4.76 (258-7)
Belgrave 4-0-23-0
Heads* 41 (56 balls)
De beer 74 (73 balls)

It's going well at the moment, but Heads only has Feeble stamina and is starting to slow up,

 

[brenoevo]

Its starting to look comfortable now...
End of Over 26: 174-1, runrate=6.69, reqrunrate=2.88 (242-10)
Finlyson 3-0-22-0
Vincent* 39 (47 balls)
Jayasuriya 83 (75 balls)

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

Heads has picked up the pace and is looking the goods, should win it from here.

End of Over 26: 154-0, runrate=5.92, reqrunrate=4.38 (258-7)
Holmes 3-0-16-0
Heads* 64 (72 balls)
De beer 84 (87 balls)

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

End of Over 33: 210-0, runrate=6.36, reqrunrate=2.88 (258-7)
Belgrave 10-0-80-0
De beer* 102 (104 balls)
Heads 101 (97 balls)

Looking great at the moment, really happy with the performance of the openers.

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

And that's the end of the match. Central Districts won by 10 wickets.
barmy army	258-7
Central Districts	259-0
 
 
End of Over 44: 259-0, runrate=5.89
Holmes	9-0-58-0
Heads*	114 (125 balls)
De Beer	136 (142 balls)

Very happy!

 

[andyc]

Won my game fairly easily:

Kangaroos 9/242
Erasmus 4/49, Canning 2/46, Giles 1/34

Magical Ponies 1/242 (44.1)
Birchall 123* (145), Nomvete 84 (112), Griffin 18* (15)

Kangaroos Magical Ponies
Top Order: mediocre mediocre
Middle Order: woeful feeble
Lower Order: worthless abysmal
Seam Bowling: feeble mediocre
Spin Bowling: feeble feeble
Fielding: woeful abysmal

First century for Birchall, and an opening stand of 207, although they slowed down a lot at the end.

 

[GotSpin]

Damnit, again i have lost when i probably should of won. Bowlers were crap as usual but Makel batted a touch to slow even though the openers but up a stand of 257

BCC 5/342

Got Spin 4/318

Makel 116 (139)
Mccammon 134 (126)

Crap ratings as usual:

BCC Got Spin
Top Order: competent proficient
Middle Order: woeful woeful
Lower Order: worthless abysmal
Seam Bowling: feeble feeble
Spin Bowling: woeful useless
Fielding: feeble woeful

 

[andyc]

Damnit, again i have lost when i probably should of won. Bowlers were crap as usual but Makel batted a touch to slow even though the openers but up a stand of 257

Crap ratings as usual:

BCC Got Spin
Top Order: competent proficient
Middle Order: woeful woeful
Lower Order: worthless abysmal
Seam Bowling: feeble feeble
Spin Bowling: woeful useless
Fielding: feeble woeful

Have, even.

But those ratings are hardly crap, given you had a proficient top order. And do you not have a spinner in your team, or at least squad? Spinners seem to be the best bowlers for me.

 

[GotSpin]

Have, even.

But those ratings are hardly crap, given you had a proficient top order. And do you not have a spinner in your team, or at least squad? Spinners seem to be the best bowlers for me.

Hmm i suppose they are ok, but its the second time i have lost with partly better ratings which is rather annoying

Yeah i dont have a spinner yet which i really need, so ill be on the market for a proficient or strong spinner.

 

[andyc]

Yeah i dont have a spinner yet which i really need, so ill be on the market for a proficient or strong spinner.

Yeah I reckon that should be your biggest priority really. I mean, I normally play three spinners myself, cause I reckon they're the best at keeping it tight. But if you have at least one, then you can still take advantage of spinning conditions.

 

[GotSpin]

Yeah I reckon that should be your biggest priority really. I mean, I normally play three spinners myself, cause I reckon they're the best at keeping it tight. But if you have at least one, then you can still take advantage of spinning conditions.

Hmm yeah, Id really like to get atleast 3 or possibly 4 new bowlers

edit: As my bowling is really letting me down.

 

[andyc]

Looks like I'm out of the cup next round:

West Coast Weevils
Top Order: strong
Middle Order: feeble
Lower Order: abysmal
Seam Bowling: competent
Spin Bowling: respectable
Fielding: woeful

 

[33/3from3.3]

Oooooh tough luck andy

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

I'll be gone next week too.

 

[PY]

My league opposition next week scored 442 in their cup game today.

Uh-oh.