steds
Hall of Fame Member
Is the claymore not his weapon?luckyeddie said:often seen brandishing his weapon in one hand and holding a claymore in the other
Is the claymore not his weapon?luckyeddie said:often seen brandishing his weapon in one hand and holding a claymore in the other
Ummm okay. what does have to do with cultural diversity ?luckyeddie said:You missed the point - I was joking about the colour of the Scots.
The usual stereotypical Scot has a redness of hair and a blueness of body, often seen brandishing his weapon in one hand and holding a claymore in the other, generally crying "Freedom" at the top of his voice and then dying.
It's called "humour", which can be culturally specific too.C_C said:Ummm okay. what does have to do with cultural diversity ?
I was just about to admit to doing it on occasion (socey matches, mainly), but it's already been established that I'm not totally English, so no comment.BoyBrumby said:It's called "humour", which can be culturally specific too.
Although, to be fair, very few English people paint themselves blue nowadays, so that's at least one difference us & yer Sweaties have.
Oh dear.steds said:Is the claymore not his weapon?
Only mainly?!?! You secretly dress as a smurf too or something?!steds said:I was just about to admit to doing it on occasion (socey matches, mainly), but it's already been established that I'm not totally English, so no comment.
Not true!!! True, they do happen to be quite ugly. But it offers a hell of a lot more than the South of England, which only presents us with stuck up ****s with stupid accents.social said:many Chinese cities resemble the industrial north on England in the bad, old days i.e. theyre ugly, polluted and offer precious little.
BoyBrumby said:Only mainly?!?! You secretly dress as a smurf too or something?!
And it would be a sad day if China becomes the second America or Australia or Canada or whatever with a blaize baritone culture from one extremity to another.Within our lifetime, a significant proportion of the Chinese population will wear western clothes, eat western food, and understand English.
Likewise, many ancient customs and practices will fall by the wayside.
As for those claiming that there is little difference between cities in the British Isles, the same can be said for many in China. In fact, many Chinese cities resemble the industrial north on England in the bad, old days i.e. theyre ugly, polluted and offer precious little.
Ah. righto.BoyBrumby said:It's called "humour", which can be culturally specific too.
Although, to be fair, very few English people paint themselves blue nowadays, so that's at least one difference us & yer Sweaties have.
I wouldnt expect you to see it any other way.parttimer said:AFAIC the race to cultural diversity is a race to the bottom. Soon enough you'll look around and have nothing in common with anybody. My 2c
It's not about China becoming a second America or anyone else. No matter how many Porsches, Luis Vuitton bags or Big Macs are sold in that country, you wont eradicate cultural diversity that has been in existence for thousands of years. However, experiences will become more blurred for the transient.C_C said:And it would be a sad day if China becomes the second America or Australia or Canada or whatever with a blaize baritone culture from one extremity to another.
However, industrialisation does not necessarily mean disappearance of culture.
The distinctive differences can still survive and thrive.
Just because one lives in a condo,wears jeans and has a porsche in the backyard doesnt mean it will be similar to western culture.
Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, UAE are highly developed and industrialised areas yet they retain their cultural integrity....there is no reason why the several culturally different areas of China or India wouldnt retain their cultural distinctiveness despite modernisation. Every culture changes- that is a given. Diversity is distinctiveness in their states, whatever states they may be. Every culture in India has undergone massive change in the last 300 years but they all retain their uniqueness and marked difference.
Add to the fact that monotone cultural perspective is pretty hard to accomplish in massively populated nations like India and China ( who have over 40% of world's people).
If Europe and the mediterranean formed one political entity tomorrow, it wouldnt translate to a baritone culture from one end of the continent to another.
Luckily, the same is said for bird flu and verrucas.C_C said:Ah. righto.
British humour is something i rarely get without prolonged exposure.
I dont think it will become blurred..i think each will incorporate elements of westernism into them while still maintaining their cultural aspect intact.social said:It's not about China becoming a second America or anyone else. No matter how many Porsches, Luis Vuitton bags or Big Macs are sold in that country, you wont eradicate cultural diversity that has been in existence for thousands of years. However, experiences will become more blurred for the transient.
As for Europe, that is almost too ridiculous for words but I'll leave that argument to an Englishman and their cultural brothers, the French.
I dont have a problem with western countries having their culture... i dont mind the culture but it does get pretty monotonous after a while......parttimer said:I am not sure why you live in Canada CC, if you're so thrilled and excited and enchanted by China or India. There is no need for western culture to appease the likes of you, you can go and live there if you're so uncomfortable in the West.
If its so great that other countries "retain aspects of their own culture", whats wrong with Western countries doing so.
My take on that is that the "elites" (living in the wealthy enclaves and mansions) are removed from most of the effects of multiculturalism / immigration, and are thus happy to appear humanitarian (which is PC and fashionable) and support it, knowing that it won't affect their lives. It is also a good supply of cheap labour.swede said:Why is it so important for all cultures to be present in one location? Not that it is, but its seen as some kind of ideal to move towards, often coming from an intellectual or wealthy elite, who have the ability and wealth to appreciate such a world.
Average people are more insecure, depending on solidarity and feeling safe with specific traditions etc.