• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

All-rounder XI vs Specialist XI

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Just a fun exercise. Selecting one XI with all all-rounders, giving them incredible batting depth and bowling options. The other XI with pure specialists and therefore better in pure skill. No Bradman though.

All-rounders need to have a batting average of minimum 20 and at least 50 wickets.

As keepers, Gilchrist goes with all-rounder XI and Knott in the specialist XI.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Goddard
Simpson
Hammond
Kallis
Sobers
Faulkner
Gilchrist (wk)
Imran
Hadlee
Ashwin
Wasim


Hutton
Hobbs
Headley
Tendulkar
Smith
Lara
Knott (wk)
Marshall
Warne/Muralitharan
Barnes
McGrath

Allrounders would win imo.

Allrounder B XI is still very good

Noble
Jayasuriya
Dexter
Worrell
S Waugh
Gilly (wk)
Miller
Shakib
S Pollock
Davidson
Benaud

Edit: forgot Simpson
 
Last edited:

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Goddard
Jayasuriya
Worrell
Kallis
Sobers
Faulkner
Gilchrist (wk)
Imran
Hadlee
Ashwin
Wasim/Davidson/Pollock


Hutton
Hobbs
Headley
Tendulkar
Smith
Lara
Knott (wk)
Marshall
Warne/Muralitharan
Barnes
McGrath

Allrounders would win imo.
Nice selections. The key advantages for the specialists is the quality of openers and spinner. Whether that would be enough to handle the depth of the all-rounders is another question.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Allrounder C

Mankad
Gayle
M Waugh
Greig
Gilly (wk)
Botham
Shakib
Jadeja
Kapil
Tate
Philander

And now it is a struggle:

Allrounder D

Shastri
Prabhakar
Rhodes
Armstrong
T Bailey
Mushtaq Mohammed
Gilly (wk)
Stokes
Cairns
Flintoff
Vaas
 

Red

The normal awards that everyone else has
Just a fun exercise. Selecting one XI with all all-rounders, giving them incredible batting depth and bowling options. The other XI with pure specialists and therefore better in pure skill. No Bradman though.

All-rounders need to have a batting average of minimum 20 and at least 50 wickets.

As keepers, Gilchrist goes with all-rounder XI and Knott in the specialist XI.
Knott averaged 33 with the bat and made 30 test 50s and 5 100s.

The keeper in the specialist XI should be a gun keeper who was a very ordinary bat. Someone who never made 100
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Knott averaged 33 with the bat and made 30 test 50s and 5 100s.

The keeper in the specialist XI should be a gun keeper who was a very ordinary bat. Someone who never made 100
Fair enough. I was willing to allow some leeway on the keeper role.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
specialists win you would think

it's law of diminishing returns with allrounders as bowlers and i don't think the extra batting makes up for it enough
Hammond, Kallis and Sobers is still a very tough middle order and then you have batting all the way until the end. In those situations, the presence of a good fifth bowler may be key.
 

Coronis

International Coach
Knott averaged 33 with the bat and made 30 test 50s and 5 100s.

The keeper in the specialist XI should be a gun keeper who was a very ordinary bat. Someone who never made 100
Notable keepers who make this criteria include Wasim Bari, Wally Grout, Bob Taylor, Niroshan Dickwella, Bert Oldfield, Don Tallon and of course, Tim Paine.

Gonna take a moment to appreciate Oldfield btw, idc how many spinners you play with, 52 stumpings in 54 matches is ****ing insane, 85 year old record now.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Notable keepers who make this criteria include Wasim Bari, Wally Grout, Bob Taylor, Niroshan Dickwella, Bert Oldfield, Don Tallon and of course, Tim Paine.

Gonna take a moment to appreciate Oldfield btw, idc how many spinners you play with, 52 stumpings in 54 matches is ****ing insane, 85 year old record now.
It's interesting, I guess even back then batsman must have loved dancing down the wicket to spinners. For some reason I thought that might have been a more modern way of playing them
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Most stumpings didn’t involve batsman running down the pitch and having a slog. A good spinner using flight and guile can lure the batsman out of the crease a few inches even if playing defensively.
Would the spinner actually aim for a stumping or for the batsmen to play loosely?
 

tony p

State Regular
All Rounder's XI

Rhodes,
Goddard,
Kallis,
Mushtaq Mohammed,
Miller, (C)
Sobers
G.A.Faulkner,
Botham,
Gilchrist (WK),
W Akram,
Ashwin.

Specialist XI

Hobbs,
Headley,
Barrington,
V Richards,
Tendulkar,
Border, (C)
Healy (WK)
Marshall,
Warne,
Barnes,
Lillee.
 

Top