Heh?! Weird!The graphic for those cricinfoing at work
![]()
Heh?! Weird!The graphic for those cricinfoing at work
![]()
They're measuring the speed of the ball while it's still in the hand and it was done by the hawkeye guys. So a little bit. The lines of where they are saying "the run up" "the shoulder" or whatever is the chief force in the movement speed at that specific time is probably a little arbitrary.Do these colourful graphics that claim to attribute Milne and Woakes' pace to different parts of their actions have any scientific basis?
A lot of people don't understand limited overs cricket IMO. Cook got butchered because he personally didn't have the potential to go at required run rates you get maybe 5% of the time. Which is completely crazy. You need a balance and when you have icing that can score at 8-9 an over you don't need everyone to always go above a run a ball. Best England ODI side of my lifetime had Cook and Trott at 1 and 3.Those people maki out that Cook isn't suited to the modern ODI are as out of step with the current ODI as Moores appears to be. I know Cook was out of form, but his run of scores pre-world cup wasn't really that atrocious that he deserved to be shown as the key element holding England back from achieving their potential. England still have a line up to pile on the runs in the last twenty - but there's a lot of reliance on Morgan and Buttler hitting the 150ish strike rate required. Root has been excellent lately, but he's more of a 100-120 strike rate player in those circumstances.
Not found in this equation: Ravi Bopara
But maybe not a Ballance.You need a balance