Heh?! Weird!The graphic for those cricinfoing at work
Heh?! Weird!The graphic for those cricinfoing at work
They're measuring the speed of the ball while it's still in the hand and it was done by the hawkeye guys. So a little bit. The lines of where they are saying "the run up" "the shoulder" or whatever is the chief force in the movement speed at that specific time is probably a little arbitrary.Do these colourful graphics that claim to attribute Milne and Woakes' pace to different parts of their actions have any scientific basis?
A lot of people don't understand limited overs cricket IMO. Cook got butchered because he personally didn't have the potential to go at required run rates you get maybe 5% of the time. Which is completely crazy. You need a balance and when you have icing that can score at 8-9 an over you don't need everyone to always go above a run a ball. Best England ODI side of my lifetime had Cook and Trott at 1 and 3.Those people maki out that Cook isn't suited to the modern ODI are as out of step with the current ODI as Moores appears to be. I know Cook was out of form, but his run of scores pre-world cup wasn't really that atrocious that he deserved to be shown as the key element holding England back from achieving their potential. England still have a line up to pile on the runs in the last twenty - but there's a lot of reliance on Morgan and Buttler hitting the 150ish strike rate required. Root has been excellent lately, but he's more of a 100-120 strike rate player in those circumstances.
Not found in this equation: Ravi Bopara
But maybe not a Ballance.You need a balance