I e seen Bumble suggest he rates Boycott higher.Damn are we really gonna rate Gavaskar below Boycott now? Why don't we rate Gooch ahead of him as well?
This is almost as awful as the Kapil Dev>Sunil Gavaskar takes I see cuz Wisden or whateverGavaskar got 12 votes in the ESPN Five cricketers of the century, Hutton got 11.
You are pushing itThis is almost as awful as the Kapil Dev>Sunil Gavaskar takes I see cuz Wisden or whatever
Richards was seen as the best batsman in the world from 76 util at least 86, but by most accounts, 88.That's only for Grace and Hobbs (and Trumper).
Btw That's arguably true for Richards as well yk?? He arguably was behind Chappell and Bpycott in the 70s (16th highest scorer that decade) and behind a bunch like Border, Miandad, Crowe, etc. in the 80s as well. So how come he's better than Trumper, the best batsman of the 1910s????
Why? Gooch has what Boycott is criticized for (lack of quick scoring) and their run output is very close. I think Boycott is better but there's no reason to think the gap is huge.Its not controversial, just awful.
How am I pushing it when pointing out his statement has the same logical basis as Kapil>Sunil crapYou are pushing it
Tbf Bumble rates Qadir as the 3rd greatest spinner ever, no?I e seen Bumble suggest he rates Boycott higher.
I personally don't, but in the 70's Boycott was rated higher, at least the first half.
Mine wasn't a serious post, anybody posting ESPN votes to support an opinion isn't serious.How am I pushing it when pointing out his statement has the same logical basis as Kapil>Sunil crap
He also rates Bumrah>McgrathTbf Bumble rates Qadir as the 3rd greatest spinner ever, no?
And not even peak Thompson.Agree. But
If Boycott has made runs against Lillee as well as Thomson (he has a terrible record against Hughes though)
And Gavaskar has a good record against Thomson, Hughes and McDermott,
Whom should I rate higher?
There was never an argument made to rate Boycott above him.Even an English man admitting this. That's how good the man was.
View attachment 45717
That's just me being me, I don't like to be serious all the time.There was never an argument made to rate Boycott above him.
Let me hear the argument that Gavaskar is the greatest batsman after Bradman.I would say that either both Gavaskar and Hutton should be in that BAB group or neither. I personally don't have either one in it.
Hammond clearlyChappell vs Hammond @capt_Luffy
I suppose you’ll be claiming Atherton was a better opener than Anwar too?Why? Gooch has what Boycott is criticized for (lack of quick scoring) and their run output is very close. I think Boycott is better but there's no reason to think the gap is huge.
No. Anwar's run output is 8.1 runs/inning greater than Atherton, comparatively Boycott's run output is 0.6 runs/inning greater than Gooch.I suppose you’ll be claiming Atherton was a better opener than Anwar too?
36.45 vs 44.52 RPI tbf. And wasn't Atherton much slower?I suppose you’ll be claiming Atherton was a better opener than Anwar too?