Johan
International Captain
Gut sense is that Hadlee doesn't belong in a top tier with those much more universally celebrated.Gut sense is that Hutton doesn't belong in a top tier with those much more universally celebrated.
Gut sense is that Hadlee doesn't belong in a top tier with those much more universally celebrated.Gut sense is that Hutton doesn't belong in a top tier with those much more universally celebrated.
Bowlers it's different. It's a much more bigger deal to be best since Bradman in cricket lore than no.2 fast bowler ever.Gut sense is that Hadlee doesn't belong in a top tier with those much more universally celebrated.
You had me until Kallis.My top ten batsman
Bradman
Tendulkar
Hobbs
Viv
Sobers
Smith
Lara
Hutton
Hammond
Kallis
If you are interested to see the results.Excellent point.
Can inferior bats be more celebrated or no?Bowlers it's different. It's a much more bigger deal to be best since Bradman in cricket lore than no.2 fast bowler ever.
I guess but not to that extent.Can inferior bats be more celebrated or no?
32 mentions for Warne is crazyIf you are interested to see the results.
Lords ATG XIs and Bowler Peer Ratings
Just going through this exhaustive list of ATG XIs from past players from Lords Cricket. I decided to just focus on 70s, 80s, 90s and 2000s cricketers and the bowlers they chose. Not including the pundits. https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMnF7vW2Mvk4VbPMCi4gmMQBDgleGW0mF Here are the...www.cricketweb.net
well it's whatever to me, I feel like it's natural for someone to become less celebrated over time like Hadlee for bowling but if that is an important metric for you then I'm not gonna ask you to change it to put a player I like over.I guess but not to that extent.
He is the clearest peer option for spinner.32 mentions for Warne is crazy
Whats wrong with kallis. He averaged 56 at same time taking 300 wicketsYou had me until Kallis.
ImoHe is the clearest peer option for spinner.
The 90s/2000s peer attack is
Wasim
Warne
McGrath
Ambrose/Murali split
My point is that if someone if top tier then they legitimately have a case to be best after Bradman and I think that necessitates a level of universal pundit acclaim. Not having it seems odd.well it's whatever to me, I feel like it's natural for someone to become less celebrated over time like Hadlee for bowling but if that is an important metric for you then I'm not gonna ask you to change it to put a player I like over.
What's wickets have to do with batting ranking tho?Whats wrong with kallis. He averaged 56 at same time taking 300 wickets
different standards igMy point is that if someone if top tier then they legitimately have a case to be best after Bradman and I think that necessitates a level of universal pundit acclaim. Not having it seems odd.
Yeah several of the players voted like that.Imo
Warne
Ambrose
Wasim/ mcgarth
Murali
He had more burden then sachin/ lara/pontingWhat's wickets have to do with batting ranking tho?
Imran.@subshakerz who is better in your opinion wasim or imran
Hmm I wouldn't give him extra points. The whole point of being an AR is to accomplish your secondary discipline without compromising your first.He had more burden then sachin/ lara/ponting