• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Bill Woodfull vs Graeme Smith

Better test batter?


  • Total voters
    10

capt_Luffy

International Coach
these analogies don't work tbh, Stathy boy is as close to Trueman as Hazelwood is to Akram, just nonsense.
Hazlewood to Cummins for me
Statham in those 13 games: 45 @ 32.2, 2 5fers.

if anything, he was lucky to play less at home. also, Statham in Australia played 14 compared to Trueman's 8, taking 43 @ 31.7 at a pathetic 3.0 WPM, Trueman took 29 @ 27.4 at 3.6 WPM.
Statham's other Test records begs otherwise. He was unable to finish any series against them at home riddled with injuries. They all are 2/3 matches in 3 or 4 separate series.
 

Johan

International Captain
Hazlewood to Cummins for me
larger for me.

Statham's other Test records begs otherwise. He was unable to finish any series against them at home riddled with injuries. They all are 2/3 matches in 3 or 4 separate series.
his whole career is riddled with injuries, maybe a hypothetical prime Statham with a great body would be Trueman level, but what we have is objectively not near fiery fred.

Australia/windies a level above other teams in batting.


again, Statham is not even close to Trueman, I'm sorry.
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
larger for me.


his whole career is riddled with injuries, maybe a hypothetical prime Statham with a great body would be Trueman level, but what we have is objectively not near fiery fred.

Australia/windies a level above other teams in batting.


again, Statham is not even close to Trueman, I'm sorry.
22.77 vs 20.74 at home and 27.79 vs 26.08 away.

These are the numbers. Trueman was fitter and both played for around equal years and in equal matches. Both bashed minnows but Trueman have a much better home record against the top 2 teams; hence ahead. Rest I think is fair, but Statham is as close to Trueman as Hazlewood is to Cummins, Bishop is to Walsh and Peter is to his son for me.
 

Johan

International Captain
22.77 vs 20.74 at home and 27.79 vs 26.08 away.

These are the numbers. Trueman was fitter and both played for around equal years and in equal matches. Both bashed minnows but Trueman have a much better home record against the top 2 teams; hence ahead. Rest I think is fair, but Statham is as close to Trueman as Hazlewood is to Cummins, Bishop is to Walsh and Peter is to his son for me.
Yeah, but at the end of the day Trueman outperforms Statham by a landslide against the two strongest Batting lineups and two biggest rivals of England, takes 4.6 WPM vs 3.6 WPM, has more memorable performances, averages 21.6 to his 24.8, strikes 15 balls faster, more destructive with 5fers almost twice as more often and so forth, Statham is great but for me he is about as close to Trueman as Hazlewood to Akram, not that Haze and Cummins are close anyway overall.
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
Yeah, but at the end of the day Trueman outperforms Statham by a landslide against the two strongest Batting lineups and two biggest rivals of England, takes 4.6 WPM vs 3.6 WPM, has more memorable performances, averages 21.6 to his 24.8, strikes 15 balls faster, more destructive with 5fers almost twice as more often and so forth, Statham is great but for me he is about as close to Trueman as Hazlewood to Akram, not that Haze and Cummins are close anyway overall.
Fair, but I think you rate Akram below Trueman while I do almost a tier ahead with Steyn, Imran and Ambrose
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I’m guessing Haze’s pews standardized average would be around 19/20 right now while Willis and Statham are around 28/29
I don't think Haze would be quite that low, especially given how Aussie pitched have played after I stopped updating it, but yeah not too far off lol.

Before 2019, the Australian bowling attacks somehow finding a way be gun on decks decent bats should all be averaging 50 on was why they were a really good side. Not Handscomb, Voges and Smith plundering runs at home on roads that should have put Australia's Test status at threat.
 
Last edited:

Johan

International Captain
Before 2019, the Australian bowling attacks somehow finding a way be gun on decks good bats should all be averaging 50 on was why they were a really good side. Not Handscomb, Voges and Smith plundering runs at home on roads that should have put Australia's Test status at threat.
60s West Indies or 2010s Australia?
 

Top