sayon basak
International Captain
Then you're just overrating Hazlewood.I have Trueman on that level with Lillee/Wasim/Joel and Statham alongside Haze/Willis/Vernon etc
Then you're just overrating Hazlewood.I have Trueman on that level with Lillee/Wasim/Joel and Statham alongside Haze/Willis/Vernon etc
Hazlewood: 279 @ 24.6Then you're just overrating Hazlewood.
Yeah it's funny but he's an example of someone who everyone says is underrated actually being underrated.Haze is underrated if anything
Hazlewood to Cummins for methese analogies don't work tbh, Stathy boy is as close to Trueman as Hazelwood is to Akram, just nonsense.
Statham's other Test records begs otherwise. He was unable to finish any series against them at home riddled with injuries. They all are 2/3 matches in 3 or 4 separate series.Statham in those 13 games: 45 @ 32.2, 2 5fers.
if anything, he was lucky to play less at home. also, Statham in Australia played 14 compared to Trueman's 8, taking 43 @ 31.7 at a pathetic 3.0 WPM, Trueman took 29 @ 27.4 at 3.6 WPM.
larger for me.Hazlewood to Cummins for me
his whole career is riddled with injuries, maybe a hypothetical prime Statham with a great body would be Trueman level, but what we have is objectively not near fiery fred.Statham's other Test records begs otherwise. He was unable to finish any series against them at home riddled with injuries. They all are 2/3 matches in 3 or 4 separate series.
22.77 vs 20.74 at home and 27.79 vs 26.08 away.larger for me.
his whole career is riddled with injuries, maybe a hypothetical prime Statham with a great body would be Trueman level, but what we have is objectively not near fiery fred.
Australia/windies a level above other teams in batting.
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
again, Statham is not even close to Trueman, I'm sorry.
I’m guessing Haze’s pews standardized average would be around 19/20 right now while Willis and Statham are around 28/29Yeah it's funny but he's an example of someone who everyone says is underrated actually being underrated.
Damn that's bizarre.I’m guessing Haze’s pews standardized average would be around 19/20 right now while Willis and Statham are around 28/29
It’s not surprising. Hazelwood had insanely flat home pitches for most of his career (same ones Warner cashed in on). You can tell he’s better than his average just by watching him bowl.Damn that's bizarre.
Yeah, but at the end of the day Trueman outperforms Statham by a landslide against the two strongest Batting lineups and two biggest rivals of England, takes 4.6 WPM vs 3.6 WPM, has more memorable performances, averages 21.6 to his 24.8, strikes 15 balls faster, more destructive with 5fers almost twice as more often and so forth, Statham is great but for me he is about as close to Trueman as Hazlewood to Akram, not that Haze and Cummins are close anyway overall.22.77 vs 20.74 at home and 27.79 vs 26.08 away.
These are the numbers. Trueman was fitter and both played for around equal years and in equal matches. Both bashed minnows but Trueman have a much better home record against the top 2 teams; hence ahead. Rest I think is fair, but Statham is as close to Trueman as Hazlewood is to Cummins, Bishop is to Walsh and Peter is to his son for me.
I actually didn't realise it was nearly that stark – simply hilarious.I’m guessing Haze’s pews standardized average would be around 19/20 right now while Willis and Statham are around 28/29
Even you wouldn't say that he's as good as a 19 averaging bowler.It’s not surprising. Hazelwood had insanely flat home pitches for most of his career (same ones Warner cashed in on). You can tell he’s better than his average just by watching him bowl.
Fair, but I think you rate Akram below Trueman while I do almost a tier ahead with Steyn, Imran and AmbroseYeah, but at the end of the day Trueman outperforms Statham by a landslide against the two strongest Batting lineups and two biggest rivals of England, takes 4.6 WPM vs 3.6 WPM, has more memorable performances, averages 21.6 to his 24.8, strikes 15 balls faster, more destructive with 5fers almost twice as more often and so forth, Statham is great but for me he is about as close to Trueman as Hazlewood to Akram, not that Haze and Cummins are close anyway overall.
my list is on last page, don't know why you rate Akram so highly, he has more caveats than TruemanFair, but I think you rate Akram below Trueman while I do almost a tier ahead.
I don't think Haze would be quite that low, especially given how Aussie pitched have played after I stopped updating it, but yeah not too far off lol.I’m guessing Haze’s pews standardized average would be around 19/20 right now while Willis and Statham are around 28/29
60s West Indies or 2010s Australia?Before 2019, the Australian bowling attacks somehow finding a way be gun on decks good bats should all be averaging 50 on was why they were a really good side. Not Handscomb, Voges and Smith plundering runs at home on roads that should have put Australia's Test status at threat.
I might have been too harsh, maybe they could have been asked to play their home Tests on the much more Test ready surfaces of Papua New Guinea and Singapore nearby.making pitches so flat it puts test status at risk made me laugh