• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Waqar Younis vs Virat Kohli

Waqar vs Virat


  • Total voters
    22

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I mean, it already was so away tbf with Sehwag opening..... Though I think Rahul could have been been a decent bet to open; did Great in England 2011. You hardly get tougher opening conditions and such a high quality series by an opener; and that too past his heydays by far. Dravid with another liability, Laxman at 3, Tendulkar at 4, Ganguly at 5 and Sehwag at 6 works for me.
Laxman would get eaten at no.3
 

BazBall21

International Captain
If cook can average 45 as an opener then I think laxman would be fine at 3 tbh
Cook would very likely have struggled facing England in England. There's a difference between that and facing less experienced attacks in England, especially in batting eras.

A bit different in the 2017-2021 period when improved assistance was there for a bigger sample of attacks, though England obviously had a weaker batting lineup then too.
 

Rob Wesley

School Boy/Girl Captain
Waqar’s stats are highly inflated via minnow bashing.

Remove SL, BD and Zim between 1990-1994 and remove Zim and BD between 1995-2003. He will be left with a total of 68 tests and 263 wickets at avg of 27. That will put him at the same level as Mitchell Starc and Mohammad Shami.
 
Last edited:

sayon basak

International Captain
Waqar’s stats are highly inflated via minnow bashing.

Remove SL, BD and Zim between 1990-1994 and remove Zim and BD between 1995-2003. He will be left with a total of 67 tests and 263 wickets at avg of 28. That will put him at the same level as Mitchell Starc and Mohammad Shami.
Exclude their numbers against minnows as well.
 

Rob Wesley

School Boy/Girl Captain
Exclude their numbers against minnows as well.
Starc has 285 wickets at 30.5 with 11 5fers in 77 tests after excluding WI and BD and also excluding pink ball tests.

Shami has 185 wickets at 29.5 with 5 5fers in 51 tests with same filter applied as Starc.


These stats are now excluding minnows but doesn’t present us insights on home advantage of bowling. A place like South Africa may be bowling friendly and allows pacers to pick a lot of wickets but Asia may not allow the same.
 

Randomfan

U19 12th Man
Waqar’s stats are highly inflated via minnow bashing.

Remove SL, BD and Zim between 1990-1994 and remove Zim and BD between 1995-2003. He will be left with a total of 68 tests and 263 wickets at avg of 27. That will put him at the same level as Mitchell Starc and Mohammad Shami.
That's actual output against non-minnows. I feel it gets a lot worse if you take away stats against non-minnows. Have you tried finding away avg of Waqar against non-minnows?

That's why when some posters start putting Donald and Waqar in the same tier, it's puzzling. I think people forget to filter minnows and Waqar has disproportionate number of cheap wickets against minnows. Samer issue I had when some posters were debating Bumrah vs Waqar and citing Waqar's wickets tally at good avg. There is no equal equal situation here as well. When difference in class is so wide, two bowlers sholdn't be compared. Longevity etc is just noise when comparing bowlers with avg of 21 vs avg of 27. Away is even more lopsided.

Shami and Starc has lesser output than Waqar, but imagine Shami and Starc playing in older era. Both can use reverse very well and would have ran riots in older era.

To compare apple to apple, what's Waqar's away avg against non-minnows looks like compared to Starc/Shami away avg against non-minnows. Waqar may still come out ahead or fall in the same range, I have not looked at it before. I will not remove NZ from Waqar. NZ was the weakest non-minnows, but a non-minnow team. Just remove SL pre 1995 and remove BD/Zim for all periods.
 

Randomfan

U19 12th Man
I was curious so here you go,

Waqar's away record against non-minnows: 139 wickets 4043 runs [ away record agaisnt Ind, Aus, WI, SA, Eng, NZ ] + 11 wickets 244 rus in SL after 1995.

Waqar away against non-minnows: Avg 28.6 - 150 wickets

Starc away against non-minnows: Avg 28.3 - 134 wickets

Shami away against non-minnows: Avg 30.3 - 145 wickets


@Rob Wesley : You were not far off. Waqar's away output is in middle of Starc and Shami.
 

sayon basak

International Captain
I was curious so here you go,

Waqar's away record against non-minnows: 139 wickets 4043 runs [ away record agaisnt Ind, Aus, WI, SA, Eng, NZ ] + 11 wickets 244 rus in SL after 1995.

Waqar away against non-minnows: Avg 28.6 - 150 wickets

Starc away against non-minnows: Avg 28.3 - 134 wickets

Shami away against non-minnows: Avg 30.3 - 145 wickets


@Rob Wesley : You were not far off. Waqar's away output is in middle of Starc and Shami.
What if the non-minnow team's Waqar faced away from home were stronger?
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
That's actual output against non-minnows. I feel it gets a lot worse if you take away stats against non-minnows. Have you tried finding away avg of Waqar against non-minnows?

That's why when some posters start putting Donald and Waqar in the same tier, it's puzzling. I think people forget to filter minnows and Waqar has disproportionate number of cheap wickets against minnows. Samer issue I had when some posters were debating Bumrah vs Waqar and citing Waqar's wickets tally at good avg. There is no equal equal situation here as well. When difference in class is so wide, two bowlers sholdn't be compared. Longevity etc is just noise when comparing bowlers with avg of 21 vs avg of 27. Away is even more lopsided.

Shami and Starc has lesser output than Waqar, but imagine Shami and Starc playing in older era. Both can use reverse very well and would have ran riots in older era.

To compare apple to apple, what's Waqar's away avg against non-minnows looks like compared to Starc/Shami away avg against non-minnows. Waqar may still come out ahead or fall in the same range, I have not looked at it before. I will not remove NZ from Waqar. NZ was the weakest non-minnows, but a non-minnow team. Just remove SL pre 1995 and remove BD/Zim for all periods.
Zimbabwe won a Test series in Pakistan in the mid 90s and gave a good game to most teams they faced.
 

Coronis

International Coach
I was curious so here you go,

Waqar's away record against non-minnows: 139 wickets 4043 runs [ away record agaisnt Ind, Aus, WI, SA, Eng, NZ ] + 11 wickets 244 rus in SL after 1995.

Waqar away against non-minnows: Avg 28.6 - 150 wickets

Starc away against non-minnows: Avg 28.3 - 134 wickets

Shami away against non-minnows: Avg 30.3 - 145 wickets


@Rob Wesley : You were not far off. Waqar's away output is in middle of Starc and Shami.
Why do you keep bolding everything
 

Rob Wesley

School Boy/Girl Captain
I was curious so here you go,

Waqar's away record against non-minnows: 139 wickets 4043 runs [ away record agaisnt Ind, Aus, WI, SA, Eng, NZ ] + 11 wickets 244 rus in SL after 1995.

Waqar away against non-minnows: Avg 28.6 - 150 wickets

Starc away against non-minnows: Avg 28.3 - 134 wickets

Shami away against non-minnows: Avg 30.3 - 145 wickets


@Rob Wesley : You were not far off. Waqar's away output is in middle of Starc and Shami.
have you included BD and wi for Starc/shami?
 

Top