_Ed_
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Four this season. Think it's usually about that number.How often do they play double headers at the Basin?
Four this season. Think it's usually about that number.How often do they play double headers at the Basin?
This is rather my point. He didn't need to play that way anymore. He'd broken the back of the chase. And yes, he was Wellington's best player, and the top order are more at fault for the defeat than he. Nonetheless when you need 40 off 6 overs with a set batsman at the crease and not a lot of batting to come, the onus is on that guy to play it smart. He really didn't.Jeez some hard taskmasters here blaming Mike Bracewell for Wellington losing. He got out playing the same way he did the entire innings. Between the other 10 batsmen they only needed to score 104 off 89. There is a collective responsibility instead of blaming g the only guy who turned up and tried to drag the team to victory. The game was probably the best domestic T20 game I've ever seen live.
Hmm I thought it was five plus the elimination and final.Four this season. Think it's usually about that number.
You're right. Turns out the fixture list I searched hadn't fully loaded.Hmm I thought it was five plus the elimination and final.
I Nevin got picked initially after Parore got injured halfway through a series against Australia (the one where Brett Lee knocked Parore's helmet off and it landed on the stumps). He actually came off in his second game - opening and top scoring in the one game NZ won. https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...and-vs-australia-6th-odi-64656/full-scorecardNevin was basically a pauper's Gilchrist in ODI's, and quite possibly the worst with the gloves of any keeper I've seen represent NZ. I'd say the selectors were mad to ever give him a shot ahead of Parore, but given how much of a dickhead Adam was I kinda get it.
Good interview from the old mod. Wonder where he is these days.I Nevin got picked initially after Parore got injured halfway through a series against Australia (the one where Brett Lee knocked Parore's helmet off and it landed on the stumps). He actually came off in his second game - opening and top scoring in the one game NZ won. https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...and-vs-australia-6th-odi-64656/full-scorecard
The innings that got him in contention was 149 off 115 balls in a List A game at the Basin after Roger Twose promoted him to bat 3. Someone has interviewed him about his career. Discusses keeping to Heath Davis as a 16 yr old, differences in training between when he started and now, Wellington dressing room, and his time in the Black Caps. One of the things he mentions is the lack of consistency in selection that made it hard to play with confidence. They've obviously gone the other way now where players get an extended run in the side.
Chris Nevin: A Career on the Edges
Dan McGrath sits down with former New Zealand wicketkeeper turned Wellington Community Cricket Manager Chris Nevin.mindthewindows.com
One of the clearest cases you'll see of a player being blocked from national duty by a same-typed player. Just never likely to get a look-in while Santner exists.Can Lennox just become an NZ regular already? I honestly wonder whether he's even on the radar – even though I reckon he could be a quality bowler in all formats (with the possible exception of T20Is).
It's mostly just attributes-type thinking: he's a flight-focused bowler who looked excellent in the Plunket games he was selected for this season. I can see him being a real challenge in tests.One of the clearest cases you'll see of a player being blocked from national duty by a same-typed player. Just never likely to get a look-in while Santner exists.
Though I definitely see him as a white ball bowler - why do you think he's less of a T20 option?
Interesting that I have the opposite perception, though you probably watch more FC than me. I see Lennox as a white-ball-first bowler who bowled plenty of flat darts and variations and first got noticed for that. I think @Flem274* was talking about him several years ago as a T20 maybe-NZ bowler.It's mostly just attributes-type thinking: he's a flight-focused bowler who looked excellent in the Plunket games he was selected for this season. I can see him being a real challenge in tests.
He's hittable at times in the Super Smash, a competition in which it is impossible for spinners to go for more than 8 runs an over. I fear that will be accentuated against batsmen who can play spin.
There's no doubt we're short a few spin bowling prospects. Lennox is already 30 (Santner is 32), might wish he was a couple of years younger.Wow. 3 for 10 off 4 overs.
That's the T20ing equivalent of what Ed Nuttall's dad was doing in Shell Cup in late 1980s. And he also never got an international cap ... and was a SLA
Seriously. On Lennox, I've thought he should get next A tour as all formats spinner to see what he can do. And anyway, he looks the best spinner on the circuit under 36 years old. So, a spring chicken.