You, Sir, know your stuff!:Does he say anything about McGrath after he talks about Marshall, Ambrose and Wasim?
re: Lillee and Ambrose, the year Ambrose first toured England (88) Lillee was playing his final FC cricket there. Wouldn’t surprise me if he was there just on that.
I love Roberts more than most here, but will find it genuinely hard to make a case for him over a y of Marshall, Holding, Garner or Ambrose.On this, Andy Roberts is underrated. Obviously WI have had a long list of great quicks but Andy gets overlooked. He was an incredible bowler. Might make my AT WI xi as the 4th quick.
Him vs Garner is the final pick. I just find Amby and Joel offer similar USPs so may opt for Andy over Joel. Marshall, Holding and Ambrose are locks.I love Roberts more than most here, but will find it genuinely hard to make a case for him over a y of Marshall, Holding, Garner or Ambrose.
What a poor assessment. Mark Taylor wasn't overrated at all.You know who I think is really overrated, and I've been meaning to say this for a long time...
MARK TAYLOR
I appreciate that Taylor batted in a tougher era than Hayden, with Akram, Ambrose, Walsh, Pollock, Waqar, etc.
But Taylor averaged just about 43. His 334* is also one of the most overrated innings in cricket history, in that it was made on a flat-track in a Test destined to become a draw. IIRC, there were no second innings in that Test. Scoring 334* on a flat track is an amazing accomplishment, but given the conditions it maybe wasn't even his best innings. Take that innings out and his Test average drops even further.
IMO, Victor Trumper, Bill Ponsford, Arthur Morris, Bob Simpson, Matthew Hayden, Bill Brown.. and maybe even Bill Lawry and Sidney Barnes (Barnes didn't bat enough for Australia really) were better...
Which leads me to my underrated player...
MATTHEW HAYDEN
I agree he batted in an easier era in terms of bowling competition. I agreed he failed in 1993. I agree he batted in flatter pitches than Taylor. And he notched up 380 against a horrible, HORRIBLE Zimbabwe side, and his batting average dips to 48 if you take that innings away.
But crickey! He was still amazing! He was still one of the best ever openers! He still deserves to be considered a candidate for an all-time Australian XV. He dominated some great bowling and crafted some great innings! I've seen YouTube videos of him destroying Shane Warne. Hayden stood up to him.
I think people underrated Hayden for the some reason people don't want to give Warne his due - not everybody likes him.
He's overrated by a certain poster here.Is Aravinda De Silva overrated in SL?
Jarrod Kimber tooHe's overrated by a certain poster here.
Why is Ambrose a lock over Garner? Both absolutely brilliantHim vs Garner is the final pick. I just find Amby and Joel offer similar USPs so may opt for Andy over Joel. Marshall, Holding and Ambrose are locks.
Go with 5 pacers imo.I love Roberts more than most here, but will find it genuinely hard to make a case for him over a y of Marshall, Holding, Garner or Ambrose.
Let Sobers keep since he won’t be bowling. (probably would do better than Flower)Go with 5 pacers imo.
Okay no. Add Colin Croft and Wes Hall to that. And Lance Gibbs as the spinner.