You do seem to have plenty of decent players, albeit finding many in form is a challenge. I wonder if at this stage of this tour the main thing for this team is finding 11 players who will come together and truly back each other to put in a real scrapping, cornered tigers efforts. In other words, that character and sense of team counts as much as talent, form etc in this particular situation?Well, to be honest, if we are to play 4 proper fast bowlers, the side I posted earlier with Pant for Jurel and Washy for NKR would be the best bet.
I mean, in an ideal world, I would drop Virat and play this side -
Jaiswal, Rahul, Washy, Gill, Pant (wk), NKR, Jaddu, Harshit, Bumrah, Siraj, Prasidh.
But given Virat has to play for whatever commercial or non-cricketing reason it is, I would rather see..
Jaiswal, Rahul, Gill, Virat, Pant (wk), Jaddu, Washy, Harshit, Bumrah, Siraj, Prasidh. Coz adding NKR for Washy does dilute the bowling as it seems Jaddu is not at his best either. But Harshit is clearly not test ready even though obvious potential is there, so I dont mind the actual XI we are gonna field tomm, which is...
Jaiswal, Rahul, Gill, Virat, Pant (wk), Jaddu, NKR, Washy, Bumrah, Siraj, Prasidh.
Its fine as long as Prasidh can bowl decently long spells.
I remember when some dribblers on here suggested Pakistan beat Australia in their 92 WC game be uae Imran Khan wore a tee shirt to the toss which had a cartoon tiger on it.cornered tigers effort
Synapses, evenI remember when some dribblers on here suggested Pakistan beat Australia in their 92 WC game be uae Imran Khan wore a tee shirt to the toss which had a cartoon tiger on it.
Fmd people lack sinapses sometimes
travis head?I am backing Travis Head to score another series defining century. Arguably the greatest all format batter of all time since the advent of T20 cricket in 2007.
He had no choice. He was always a very average test batsman. It's a joke that he fooled the Indian selectors for so long. That Australia are 2-1 is solely down to him. The much maligned Babar Azam is a comfortably better batsman than this bloke.Confirmed Rohit has “opted out” of the 5th test.
Yes. WC winning 100 in India, WTC F winning 100 in England. Can't look past that.travis head?
travis head, the south australian batter?Yes. WC winning 100 in India, WTC F winning 100 in England. Can't look past that.
How many other Heads are there?travis head, the south australian batter?
Virat & AB are clearly betterI am backing Travis Head to score another series defining century. Arguably the greatest all format batter of all time since the advent of T20 cricket in 2007.
I would give Virat one last chance cause he is atleast a test batter unlike Rohit, and it he can do anything in this test then he can **** off.Ideal side tomorrow
Jaiswal
Rahul
Gill
Jurel
Pant
Sundar
Reddy
Jaddu
Rana
Bumrah
Krishna
And its a good thing. With the performance as it is, time for people to stand up and tell people to perform or get the **** out.A house divided indeed
I would get rid of Kohli too and bring in Sarfaraz but if this is the side, I will definitely take it!For Gill and Jurel is the official rumour, basically confirmed now.
Deep also rested for injury- Prasidh comes in. Gill drops to no.6, Sundar up to no.3. The consistent Jurel goes in at no.5 possibly.
KL
Jais
Sundar
Kohli
Jurel
Gill
Jadeja
Reddy
Prasidh
Siraj
Bumrah
Dhruv Jurel To Replace Rishabh Pant In Sydney? Latest Report Reveals BIG Change In India's Playing XI
India have come up with surprising selections throughout the series against Australia and it would be a shock if they decide to replace Rishabh Pant with Dhruv Jurel, solely because the former's shot-making has failed till now. , Cricket News - Times Nowwww.timesnownews.com
My boo doesn't need any more on his plate. Let him focus on bowling short spells.Been reading rumours about both of them. Would be terribly retrogressive making Kohli captain, unless he's not fit why can't Bumrah do it?