• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Absurdly Awesome Cricket Stats

Coronis

International Coach
Whilst Grimmett had one of the greatest bowling series in 35/36, it didn’t start out so dominant for him. In fact, O’Reilly was Australia’s leading bowler after the first two tests, with 13 @ 19.15 vs Grimmett’s (relatively) modest 11 @ 24.63.

He then proceeded to take 5 5’fers in the remaining 6 innings, taking 10+ wickets in all 3 remaining matches. 5/56, 5/32, 7/40, 3/70, 6/73 and 7/100. To end with figures of 44 @ 14.59 vs O’Reilly’s 27 @ 17.03

The only innings Grimmett didn’t take a 5’fer in those last 3 tests was of course, O’Reilly’s single 5’fer for the entire series - 5/20
 

Coronis

International Coach
So was thinking about 6’s recently. (in tests)

Top 5 all time are

Stokes 131 in 190 innings
McCullum 107 in 176 innings
Gilchrist 100 in 137 innings
Gayle 98 in 182 innings
Kallis 97 in 280 innings

but lets look at the some specialist 6 hitters (min 30 6’s)

Afridi 52 in 48 innings
Pant 55 in 56 innings
de Grandhomme 41 in 44 innings
Cairns 87 in 104 innings
Sharma 84 in 101 innings

Matthews and Sharma have a decent chance to break in the top 5. Maybe Southee too. Pant would’ve been a lock but for his injury, hope he comes back well.
 

Molehill

Cricketer Of The Year
If Stokes plays for another 2-3 years, he could put that record virtually beyond reach forever.

Harry Brook could be one to watch, 26 6's in 18 Tests.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
So was thinking about 6’s recently. (in tests)

Top 5 all time are

Stokes 131 in 190 innings
McCullum 107 in 176 innings
Gilchrist 100 in 137 innings
Gayle 98 in 182 innings
Kallis 97 in 280 innings

but lets look at the some specialist 6 hitters (min 30 6’s)

Afridi 52 in 48 innings
Pant 55 in 56 innings
de Grandhomme 41 in 44 innings
Cairns 87 in 104 innings
Sharma 84 in 101 innings

Matthews and Sharma have a decent chance to break in the top 5. Maybe Southee too. Pant would’ve been a lock but for his injury, hope he comes back well.
Kallis WAG
 

Silver Silva

International Regular
Only 7 cricketers in history have scored a hundred and taken a 5for on more than one occasion in their test career..
(Sir Ian Botham,Ravi Ashwin,Sir Garry Sobers , Jacques Kallis, Ravindra Jadeja, Mushtaq Mohammad, Shakib Al Hasan)

Three of the 7 were involved in the 1st Test between India and Bangladesh!
 

tony p

State Regular
A.C (Jack) Russell of Essex, last 3 Test innings for England in 1922/23 were, 96, 140 & 111. (Overall, 10 Tests,910@56.87, 5 centuries)
Never played again.
He played First class cricket until 1930.
 

Coronis

International Coach
A.C (Jack) Russell of Essex, last 3 Test innings for England in 1922/23 were, 96, 140 & 111. (Overall, 10 Tests,910@56.87, 5 centuries)
Never played again.
He played First class cricket until 1930.
I believe you mean C.A.G Russell. He was mainly an opener, and became ill after that tour, performing pretty terribly (average 30 and 34 over 25+ matches each) in the next two county seasons. By that time Sutcliffe had firmly established himself alongside Hobbs.
 

AndrewB

International Vice-Captain
He was A.C. Russell in scorecards during his career (and later - I have a book from the 50s which has references to A.C. Russell, H. Makepeace, E. Tyldesley, L.G. Berry and a few other sets of initials that you don't get in modern books. Though as I've seen pointed out, if you insist on going by their birth certificates for pre-war cricketers, why is Bob Willis not listed as R.G. Willis?)
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
He was A.C. Russell in scorecards during his career (and later - I have a book from the 50s which has references to A.C. Russell, H. Makepeace, E. Tyldesley, L.G. Berry and a few other sets of initials that you don't get in modern books. Though as I've seen pointed out, if you insist on going by their birth certificates for pre-war cricketers, why is Bob Willis not listed as R.G. Willis?)
Just want to say just noticed that Bob Willis was more Bob Dylan than Dylan himself......
 

Top