Bradmanesque.No-one realised yet Brook's average has dropped below 60. It's now 59.91
Sutcliffe wins again.No-one realised yet Brook's average has dropped below 60. It's now 59.91
Peter Sutcliffe?Sutcliffe wins again.
Any SutcliffePeter Sutcliffe?
Dropping like a stone.No-one realised yet Brook's average has dropped below 60. It's now 59.91
Averaging 30 over a career (which you only reach by conveniently ignoring the worst series') is still bad for a supposed "great" bowler. Over a massive sample too so not like you can blame that. Just accept it brotherItās not a fact.
He was obviously awful in his first Ashes, which he had no business being at. And last year couldnāt buy a wicket. Heās somewhere around the 30 mark for the rest of the time in the Ashes which certainly doesnāt support the idiotic narrative you chip on shoulder merchants try and sustain about him being crap in the Ashes.
He would say himself that Broad was the better Ashes bowler. But thatās neither here nor there.
We literally just made fun of coronis for doing the whole āif you ignore his good games heās badā and now youāre going to turn around and say āif we ignore his bad games heās okā lmaoItās not a fact.
He was obviously awful in his first Ashes, which he had no business being at. And last year couldnāt buy a wicket. Heās somewhere around the 30 mark for the rest of the time in the Ashes which certainly doesnāt support the idiotic narrative you chip on shoulder merchants try and sustain about him being crap in the Ashes.
He would say himself that Broad was the better Ashes bowler. But thatās neither here nor there.
He was terrible. The test for this whether you'd want him to bowl at both ends if he was playing against your team. The answer for Aus supporters is "yes" because he sucked against Australia.Itās not a fact.
He was obviously awful in his first Ashes, which he had no business being at. And last year couldnāt buy a wicket. Heās somewhere around the 30 mark for the rest of the time in the Ashes which certainly doesnāt support the idiotic narrative you chip on shoulder merchants try and sustain about him being crap in the Ashes.
He would say himself that Broad was the better Ashes bowler. But thatās neither here nor there.
You forgot unfit Robinson and OnionsHe was terrible. The test for this whether you'd want him to bowl at both ends if he was playing against your team. The answer for Aus supporters is "yes" because he sucked against Australia.
Pommy bowlers better than Anderson vs Aus in his time playing:
Broad
Tremlett
Swann
Flintoff
Bresnan
Woakes
Harmison
Jones
Hoggard
Archer
Wood
Rankin
Overton
Ball
Curran
Mahmood x 2
Very accurate post but I have to disagree if Sajid Mahmood is one of the 2 MahmoodsHe was terrible. The test for this whether you'd want him to bowl at both ends if he was playing against your team. The answer for Aus supporters is "yes" because he sucked against Australia.
Pommy bowlers better than Anderson vs Aus in his time playing:
Broad
Tremlett
Swann
Flintoff
Bresnan
Woakes
Harmison
Jones
Hoggard
Archer
Wood
Rankin
Overton
Ball
Curran
Mahmood x 2
Why Coronis do this. He's bad even if you don't ignore his good games lolWe literally just made fun of coronis for doing the whole āif you ignore his good games heās badā
Well said.Very accurate post but I have to disagree if Sajid Mahmood is one of the 2 Mahmoods
That guy was ****ing awful, worse than Anderson IMO. Horrible lid too
for funsies. Anderson posts are mostly for funsiesVery accurate post but I have to disagree if Sajid Mahmood is one of the 2 Mahmoods
That guy was ****ing awful, worse than Anderson IMO. Horrible lid too
Why Coronis do this. He's bad even if you don't ignore his good games lol
You're an ambulance.Can somebody please call me an ambulance?
Well that's besides the point tbh.You're an ambulance.
Nice to see an English cricket fan getting some rare laughs.Can somebody please call me an ambulance? I've bust my ribs laughing so hard at Coronis's funsies.
Nah, the dummies are pointing to Andersonās average and saying itās proof he was bad in the Ashes. My point is that he was V bad in his first Ashes and last year but an overall average tells us little. Itās more that I reject this idea he was never good in the Ashes. But itās the same gang of buffoons desperately clinging to what they can because they have deep rooted insecurity about England producing a legend.We literally just made fun of coronis for doing the whole āif you ignore his good games heās badā and now youāre going to turn around and say āif we ignore his bad games heās okā lmao