thierry henry
International Coach
It's the percentage of wickets taken by those bowlers which were ducks (apologies if you knew this and were joking)Surprised not to see Danny duck Morrison on this list.
It's the percentage of wickets taken by those bowlers which were ducks (apologies if you knew this and were joking)Surprised not to see Danny duck Morrison on this list.
haha cheers mate I'm just tired. See the word duck and Danny springs to mind.It's the percentage of wickets taken by those bowlers which were ducks (apologies if you knew this and were joking)
98?At the end of 1995, Sachin's stats as ODI Opener was miles ahead of the rest.
48 avg 94 SR.
2nd highest SR was Jayasuriya's 78 ( 28 avg )
And 90% of them were striking at below 70.
That day shall never come.Any excuse to bring this up again:
Fun Rubel stats
- Averages 249 against India
- Yet to take a wicket against Pakistan after 47 overs
- His best figures of 5/166 came against NZ at an economy of nearly 6
- If you take out Zimbabwe he has 22 wickets in 26 Tests @ 101
- Averages 316 at a strike rate of 498 in drawn matches
And Steve Smith was ducking him until he retired.Any excuse to bring this up again:
Fun Rubel stats
- Averages 249 against India
- Yet to take a wicket against Pakistan after 47 overs
- His best figures of 5/166 came against NZ at an economy of nearly 6
- If you take out Zimbabwe he has 22 wickets in 26 Tests @ 101
- Averages 316 at a strike rate of 498 in drawn matches
fwiw the duck stat is actually led by these guys (min 30 innings)Surprised not to see Danny duck Morrison on this list.
In the history until 1996In the history of the game up until then, in the year 1995 or among active players that year?
78.. 2nd fastest scorer among openers in the history. And Sachin was 94
By the end of their careers Sanath had a higher SR though78.. 2nd fastest scorer among openers in the history. And Sachin was 94
I was talking about Sachin vs Rest. Not Sachin Vs Sanath.By the end of their careers Sanath had a higher SR though
Sachin was incredible but comparing him to Sanath who didn't really succeed as the explosive opener he was known for until after 1995 is a bit of a cop out
Sachin 88, Sanath 91What were the relatives positions at the end of 1996?
41 matches as Opener.Sanath wasn't even an opener for most of the early 90's.
Sobers vs IndiaIs Ian Botham vs India the best ever allrounder performance vs a country
14 Tests , 1201 runs @ 70.64, 5 100s, 5 50s & 59 wkts @ 26.40, 1 10fer, 6 5fers
Yeah I get it, but you used Sachin's stats v Sanath's to demonstrate the point which doesn't really make sense since that was before the latter started making a name for himself in the positionI was talking about Sachin vs Rest. Not Sachin Vs Sanath.
If 90s Sachin was playing in a strong batting line up, he would have been more aggressive.
Wow. Poor old India first had Sobers then Botham to give nightmares .Sobers vs India
Bat avg 83.48
Ball avg 25.69
The name is not important.. 2nd highest was 78.Yeah I get it, but you used Sachin's stats v Sanath's to demonstrate the point which doesn't really make sense since that was before the latter started making a name for himself in the position