• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ponting Vs Gavaskar

Gavaskar Vs Ponting


  • Total voters
    26
  • This poll will close: .

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
How did he cheat?
That's the problem really. The ****er just found an obscure rule from like the Triassic Period like a proper scumbag of an attorney. Technically not cheating, but then again technically Azhar is not a fixer.
 

Coronis

International Coach
That's the problem really. The ****er just found an obscure rule from like the Triassic Period like a proper scumbag of an attorney. Technically not cheating, but then again technically Azhar is not a fixer.
Underarm bowling has still been legal longer than overarm or round arm bowling.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Nah I’ve always hated Ian. Plus I rate him as the best bat of his time so I’ve got to fully support the bloke.
Well then, let's agree to disagree on how much hate he should get. Don't worry, I will hate him more to make up for the lack of hats from you.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Yes, Kohli is around the same level as Ponting. Of Gavaskar, he isn't and 2-3 years I hardly believe is capable of changing that. The highest I can see him is around Chappell level.
And Gavaskar is in a higher tier to Chappell?
 

kyear2

International Coach
If Viv is then so is Gavaskar. Though honestly, Chappell has some decent arguments to be on that tier, but his English record isn't as Great and his SC numbers are pumped by a single double ton in a flat pancake Pakistani road without Imran.
Do you understand that SC records didn't mean nearly as much back then as they do today?

From a peer rating perspective and historical perspective, Viv is held way above Sunny.

Chappell is close, very close and it's between those two for second best of that era. Well 3rd, if Barry is included.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Do you understand that SC records didn't mean nearly as much back then as they do today?

From a peer rating perspective and historical perspective, Viv is held way above Sunny.

Chappell is close, very close and it's between those two for second best of that era. Well 3rd, if Barry is included.
Disagree on all 3 counts. Let's go one by one.

India had Bedi-Chandra-Prasanna-Venkat at home. The best spinning attack by a gazillion at that time, arguably ever. Bedi, Chandra and especially Prasanna did really well in their Aussie tour. It was a very far thing from easy runs in India, especially at middle order. Pakistan had Imran, who had well developed his reverse swing and was fuming, alongside excellent home bowlers in Qadir and Nawaz.

Viv is held above by peer ratings in general. Way or not, or if even at all, depends on who you ask. And again, peer ratings is a highly flawed method of judgement, I only use them for players who are old enough to not be properly evaluated by stats.

Chappell is close, not very close. There is a small but well present gulf between these two. On Barry, love him but think ranking him this high is makes less sense than ranking Procter the 2nd Greatest cricketer. Yes, I have seen your reasons and yes I think most are trash, you follow them because you want to believe in Barry and have an attacking high tier opener.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Disagree on all 3 counts. Let's go one by one.

India had Bedi-Chandra-Prasanna-Venkat at home. The best spinning attack by a gazillion at that time, arguably ever. Bedi, Chandra and especially Prasanna did really well in their Aussie tour. It was a very far thing from easy runs in India, especially at middle order. Pakistan had Imran, who had well developed his reverse swing and was fuming, alongside excellent home bowlers in Qadir and Nawaz.

Viv is held above by peer ratings in general. Way or not, or if even at all, depends on who you ask. And again, peer ratings is a highly flawed method of judgement, I only use them for players who are old enough to not be properly evaluated by stats.

Chappell is close, not very close. There is a small but well present gulf between these two. On Barry, love him but think ranking him this high is makes less sense than ranking Procter the 2nd Greatest cricketer. Yes, I have seen your reasons and yes I think most are trash, you follow them because you want to believe in Barry and have an attacking high tier opener.
Think was yesterday I was asked for a top 10, and I suggested that behind my top 8, Chappell and yes, Barry (based on talent) was being considered for the next two.

The only argument that could be used against Chappell could be longevity, but that's neither here nor there for me beyond a certain point.
I would say equal, if I were to choose one as a batsman, the only differentiator would be Sunny is the rarer great opener, as cricketers, Chappell.

Same tier for me, and would imagine most on the forum.
 

Top