kyear2
International Coach
Easily.Ponting is closer to Lara/Tendulkar than Dravid/Kallis.
Easily.Ponting is closer to Lara/Tendulkar than Dravid/Kallis.
Having differing opinions from yours aren't inconsistencies.Your inconsistencies
Nonsense. I can give you a list of many peers, from Holding to Hadlee to the Chappell bros to Lillee to Border, who rated Imran as the best AR of the era, akin to Wasim as the best pacer of his era. He makes more ATG XIs than any of them and was rated ahead of them in Wisden's Cricketers of the Century. You don't need to add the word dominant since I never put that as a criteria, I said best.He was not clearly seen as the no. 1 dominant all rounder of the era, and you know this.
Yes so I rate him 3rd best of the 80s. So what is the inconsistency exactly?He was clearly seen as third best of the 80's and 4th for overall mid 70's -80's era including Lillee.
Those don't apply to the arguments you're making though.As is scoring consistently and in tougher playing conditions, which are a tad bit more important....
There are different reasons in favor of Dravid. It's not open and shut.Kallis also played in tougher conditions than Dravid and was just as consistent.
Largely untrue. WI was hardly tougher to bat for the majority than India.Those don't apply to the arguments you're making though.
Sunny wasn't more consistent, he had more big scores, and he definely played in easier conditions than Viv.
Kallis also played in tougher conditions than Dravid and was just as consistent.
As in favor of Ponting and Kallis, but yeah, I will mostly place him behind them.There are different reasons in favor of Dravid. It's not open and shut.
I thought you were beyond getting creeped outStalking my posts is creepy though.
Or, or..... You could be wrong?The idea that Ponting is closer to Tendulkar than Kallis is the very reason I feel Ponting is massively overrated.
Good question. First off, we shouldn't conflate a rating as an AR for a rating as a bat.If you think Kallis is rated both poorly and highly, why do you accept the poor rating as evidence of something, but not the high one?
As you can be about Richards and Sunny, or a variety of things..... All of us can be wrong.Or, or..... You could be wrong?
If that was the opinion back then, and still now???
Note, not saying you are, I'm saying for me, and apparently others that's not the opinion held.
The weird **** you take credit for.Thank you. You're learning so well.
We aren't conflating AR and batting ratings. It's a question of why differing ratings by the same people on the same player would hold weight when they confirm your opinion but not when they run contrary to it.Good question. First off, we shouldn't conflate a rating as an AR for a rating as a bat.
Second, the high AR rating is true but is just further evidence to me that Kallis was the best AR of his era. That's it.
Peers of his time aren't qualified to compare him to Sobers or Bradman or whatever but to other players from his time. That's how I use peer rating, only respective to peers they play against.
Post them, because I've been looking. The best I've found was Hadlee saying that he was possibly the most consistent.Nonsense. I can give you a list of many peers, from Holding to Hadlee to the Chappell bros to Lillee to Border, who rated Imran as the best AR of the era, akin to Wasim as the best pacer of his era. He makes more ATG XIs than any of them and was rated ahead of them in Wisden's Cricketers of the Century. You don't need to add the word dominant since I never put that as a criteria, I said best.
Yes so I rate him 3rd best of the 80s. So what is the inconsistency exactly?
What? Indian pitches were tougher to bat on that West Indian ones? The dead ass pitches of India compared to Sabina and Kensington?Largely untrue. WI was hardly tougher to bat for the majority than India.
And the latter is the reason Kallis is slightly better than BOTH Dravid and Ponting.
Not by uI thought you were beyond getting creeped out
No, the Chennai turners to Georgetown..... You yourself said how flat Bourda and QPO were; and Bengaluru, Kanpur and Chennai were anything but flat. We all can cherry pick pitches.What? Indian pitches were tougher to bat on that West Indian ones? The dead ass pitches of India compared to Sabina and Kensington?
That's the position you're putting forward?
As you can be about Richards and Sunny, or a variety of things..... All of us can be wrong.
And highly doubt that's really the opinion till now, atleast for the majority. Not when Ponting ranked 12th (quite high) and Kallis 13th (about right).
I am invalidating the point that majority shares the opinion that Ponting being closer to Sachin than Kallis; not my personal views in which I made it clear how overrated he is I feel.Lol, you can't use the same list to validate one, but say the rating for the other one is wrong, lol