• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Debate thread for 2024 Ranking of batsmen poll

capt_Luffy

International Captain
Is he really good enough for be making this list? Don’t know much about him but the guy does only average 39
At a time when most others averaged sub 30, only Clem Hill is comparable with him from that era. You can't really assign everything to just stats, especially pre WWI. His peer ratings was on par with basically anyone to ever play. Trumper getting ranked any lower is a travesty imo.
 

PlayerComparisons

International Vice-Captain
At a time when most others averaged sub 30, only Clem Hill is comparable with him from that era. You can't really assign everything to just stats, especially pre WWI. His peer ratings was on par with basically anyone to ever play. Trumper getting ranked any lower is a travesty imo.
Fair enough, I don’t know much about that era
 

Socerer 01

International Captain
At a time when most others averaged sub 30, only Clem Hill is comparable with him from that era. You can't really assign everything to just stats, especially pre WWI. His peer ratings was on par with basically anyone to ever play. Trumper getting ranked any lower is a travesty imo.
wasnt the myth around Trumper debunked by many in another thread
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
I am furious that Williamson has been ranked over AB de Villiers. How can that be justified?
One bats 3 behind iffy openers
and averages 55 with THIRTY TWO 100s in 100 tests and carries his team while the other sat behind G Smith, Amla, and Kallis, (all of whom did more heavy lifting) and averaged over 4 runs less, and scored TWENTY TWO hundreds in 114 tests.

There are several extra openers plus quite a few mobs ahead of ABDV.
 
Last edited:

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
I am struggling to hold the fact that Williamson averages 55 in my head. Smith is averaging 57 currently. There's barely anything between those 2 averages.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
One bats 3 behind iffy openers
and averages 55 with THIRTY TWO 100s in 100 tests and carries his team while the other sat behind G Smith, Amla, and Kallis, (all of whom did more heavy lifting) and averaged over 4 runs less, and scored TWENTY TWO hundreds in 114 tests.

There are several extra openers plus quite a few mobs ahead of ABDV.
Out of his 100 tests, he's played exactly 50 tests vs Aus, Ind, Eng and SA (top 4 teams)

But he averages just 38.91 from 50 tests against these top teams.

Only 11 of his 32 hundreds have come in these 50 tests.
 

Top