Sunil1z
International Regular
Afghanistan also needs help from your side tomorrow.An Afghanistan win in good time is needed here for a CT qualification boost for England
Sentences you never expected to be writing...
Afghanistan also needs help from your side tomorrow.An Afghanistan win in good time is needed here for a CT qualification boost for England
Sentences you never expected to be writing...
Then Afghanistan must lose.An Afghanistan win in good time is needed here for a CT qualification boost for England
Sentences you never expected to be writing...
I think India and S Africa have looked a cut above Australia and NZ.I don't think there'll be much of a quality gap between whoever finishes 2, 3 and 4 anyway
SA are basically to cricket what Ireland are to rugby - by my reckoning they've only ever won one knockout game (against SL in 2015). Chances of them winning a semi are questionable.I think India and S Africa have looked a cut above Australia and NZ.
That's not to say either NZ or Aus wouldn't beat India or SA in the SF but so far India and SA have been exceptionally good and as neutral, that's the final I'd like to see.
Kuldeep and Harry Kewell's lovechild....And who is this Kewldeep guy? Is he Kuldeep's twin?
How? When NZ beat SL and Pak beat ENG they'll have 5 wins fighting for 4thTeam qualifying with four wins still on
in the scenario of nz loss to SL, Pak loss to England, and Afghanistan losses against both Aus and Sa, a team with four wins can make the semi.How? When NZ beat SL and Pak beat ENG they'll have 5 wins fighting for 4th
Well if that happens SL only have to beat BAN to also have 4 wins for a semiin the scenario of nz loss to SL, Pak loss to England, and Afghanistan losses against both Aus and Sa, a team with four wins can make the semi.
Right. That was @Magrat Garlick’s point.Well if that happens SL only have to beat BAN to also have 4 wins for a semi
Except it only takes one of NZ to beat SL or Pak to beat ENG for 4 wins to mean nothing. I'm voting on that scenarioRight. That was @Magrat Garlick’s point.