Because that XI is the best XI.So the bowling isn't exploitable if you play an XI you haven't been playing?
Thats fine. He is still much better than Siraj on current form. He averages 14 in the world cups with close to 40 wickets. Better avg than even Mcgrath. He can go for 6 an over but if he gets 2 wickets thats fine. All 5 bowlers are wicket takers. Thats the most important thing.Itd definitely be a stronger XI IMO. Though I still think Shami may get taken on
That's more or less the same bowling line up from 2017 Champions Trophy[
Because that XI is the best XI.
3 spinners + Shami Bumrah with Pandya as cover.
Ashwin + Shami >> Thakur + Siraj
It was foolish having both on the bench. And Ashwin too would have played yesterday if Pandya was fit.
That’s fine. No bragging. And you’re right about the no confidence.FMD.......these teams are here to win a world cup ffs. To do that and claim to be champions you've got to beat the best of the rest. All this talk of being afraid and looking for the easy route just means youve got no confidence in your side and you cant then take the bragging rights if you win. Shameful.
I'm looking forward to NZ bowling 40 overs of Santner, Sodhi, Ravindra, and Phillips. Mitchell and Neesham can share the other 10:I have been surprised with how few turners we've been getting and genuinely would relish seeing conditions favour spin more.
I think NZ is stronger with Sodhi in it. I think it'd definitely help NZ vs SA/Aus
India's batting is not any more solid than another 4-5 sides in the tourney. It's the bowling that has been leagues ahead of others.yeah kuldeep and pandya are very exploitable and all it takes is a bad day from one of the other guys and you're on
"exploitable" isn't to say "bad", but it's just fact of the matter that the path of least resistance to beating india given their inability to roll with seven bowling options is to force a bad day out of some of their more vulnerable options, and then as athers said, they've got a very dangerous top order but england of all teams, england, showed even they can be breached! with aus on the trot, nz hitting their straps with the cavalry still to arrive, and india and the saffers in imperious form it's all up for grabs really - any of these teams are capable of knocking each other off
And Kane can 'throw' in some offiesI'm in favour. Chapman can bowl too, of course. Though I guess if we give three left-arm orthodoxes a bowl in a match, people might mistake us for Bangladesh.
Indian bowling can be taken down if you attack Bumrah early . Siraj is completely off colour and shami can go for runs , despite taking wicketsIndia's batting is not any more solid than another 4-5 sides in the tourney. It's the bowling that has been leagues ahead of others.
But it can be breached, yes. Gotta keep gambhiring
Yeah we are ****edIndian bowling can be taken down if you attack Bumrah early . Siraj is completely off colour and shami can go for runs , despite taking wickets
And you have still missed the part-time spin of two guys, Williamson and Chapman here.I'm looking forward to NZ bowling 40 overs of Santner, Sodhi, Ravindra, and Phillips. Mitchell and Neesham can share the other 10:
Conway, Ravindra, Williamson, Mitchell, Phillips, Chapman, Neesham, Young, Latham, Santner, Sodhi
Bat deep - aim for 5 hundy
Not totally against the idea on a turner, but do remember;I think NZ is stronger with Sodhi in it. I think it'd definitely help NZ vs SA/Aus