GoodAreasShane
Cricketer Of The Year
8 out of the top 15 entries on that list there
At least we're consistent
At least we're consistent
Over achievers8 out of the top 15 entries on that list there
At least we're consistent
Have plenty of Shield records do South Australia. Just not the ones that they would want to haveOver achievers
Heaps of players have a better case than Stoinis tbh.No idea why Queensland continues to pick Guthrie when they have other contracted bowlers
As for Short, can easily make a case for he, Hardie & Turner being in India right now in front of Stoinis
It's not like QLD don't have exciting looking young homegrown quicks, just seem allergic to actually giving any of them a decent oppurtunity.No idea why Queensland continues to pick Guthrie when they have other contracted bowlers
As for Short, can easily make a case for he, Hardie & Turner being in India right now in front of Stoinis
I often assume they're injured when they aren't picked but it's probably not true half the time.It's not like QLD don't have exciting looking young homegrown quicks, just seem allergic to actually giving any of them a decent oppurtunity.
Bartlett can’t bowl atm & Sully is being load managedI often assume they're injured when they aren't picked but it's probably not true half the time.
What are Bartlett and Sully up to atm?
It should be Turner. As exciting as Short is he's only really shown he can open, and they do not need another opener. Turner is exactly what the ODI team needs, a middle-order/finisherNo idea why Queensland continues to pick Guthrie when they have other contracted bowlers
As for Short, can easily make a case for he, Hardie & Turner being in India right now in front of Stoinis
Was aware about Bartlett (him being the one younger quick who actually has had fairly consistent game time) but didn't know Sully was under cotton wool, thanks for the updateBartlett can’t bowl atm & Sully is being load managed
They’re petrified of them getting injured again
Yeah I think that's what they were thinking with David's little stint but it didn't work out.It should be Turner. As exciting as Short is he's only really shown he can open, and they do that abother opener. Turner is exactly what the ODI team needs, a middle-order/finisher
Only ever seems to make runs against SA.Merlo is only 24? Feels like he should be way older.
The whole Tim David in the ODI squad is even more annoying when you remember Ashton Turner existsYeah I think that's what they were thinking with David's little stint but it didn't work out.
Turner is a finisher without being a hack. Also fields and bowls better than David. Should have trialled him instead.
I don't mind the idea of trying to remake Short into a finisher but it was going to take longer than one series in SA to do it.
He will get better with age, like a fine . . . shirazMerlo is only 24? Feels like he should be way older.