TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Trundler doesn't seem to understand intracacies like conditions. Or it's convenient to ignore them
Well considering he seems to find it convenient to ignore his own statements...Trundler doesn't seem to understand intracacies like conditions. Or it's convenient to ignore them
Getting used to conditions at FC level is not as hard as tests.Trundler doesn't seem to understand intracacies like conditions. Or it's convenient to ignore them
I've done the exact opposite to be as clear as possible but you do you.Well considering he seems to find it convenient to ignore his own statements...
No you haven't. Breathlessly saying so doesn't change that.I've done the exact opposite to be as clear as possible but you do you.
bro just admit you're wrongGetting used to conditions at FC level is not as hard as tests.
No I'm not.bro just admit you're wrong
The irony of you straight up making **** up about what I've done whilst hitting me with the petulant "no u"..No you haven't. Breathlessly saying so doesn't change that.
This is exactly what you are doing lolThe irony of you straight up making **** up about what I've done whilst hitting me with the petulant "no u"..
It's not thoughThis is exactly what you are doing lol
Its hard enough. And their form in the tests suggested they'd have trouble at club cricket let alone shield.Getting used to conditions at FC level is not as hard as tests.
no uIt's not though
Test success is its own matter. Good FC cricketer failing in tests is the norm, not vice versa.Its hard enough. And their form in the tests suggested they'd have trouble at club cricket let alone shield.
I was quoting exactly what he wrote. Maybe he should read his own statements again.This is exactly what you are doing lol
But they didn't succeed. They sucked. Sucked hard. They were so bad it is reasonable to state they'd have struggled in grade cricket. Particularly when the pitches aren't as good.Test success is its own matter. Good FC cricketer failing in tests is the norm, not vice versa.
By my calculations, based on home and away numbers for Australian batsmen, if Div 1 CC & Sheffield Shield were the same quality, an Australian batsman averaging 50 in Australian first-class cricket would average about 28.63 in the same level of competition in England.
Given that the numbers actually tend to be about the same, or even higher in England, this indicates that the Shield is at least 170% the strength of division 1 County cricket. Not quite twice as good, but not far off.
Nobody in that line up is getting into the England first 11. A few might be squaddies but that's about it.Said 19 year-old doesn't make the full strength side IMO.
Bancroft
Whiteman
S.Marsh
Green
M. Marsh
Hardie
Inglis
Agar
Richardson
Paris
Morris
If you you think S.Marsh in there is a cheat you've also got strong back ups like Philippe, Turner, Stoinis and D.Short.
If we're being completely literal Harris probably gets in there but he doesn't stand out. If he were to move to WA tomorrow he's not ousting Bancroft and Whiteman and likely only plays because S.Marsh is done.
Green would have a shout batting at 8.Nobody in that line up is getting into the England first 11. A few might be squaddies but that's about it.
I mean Maddinson was pretty much Durham's worst batsman last season so I'd argue somewhat against that.Yeah that's the thing, it would have to be the best England players playing to be appropriate. Whereas most half decent Aussies state players will dominate county cricket, or at the very least hold their won due to the lower standard.
Also County cricket is more commercialised, so it's normal to contract overseas players and make it worthwhile. A top-class English domestic cricketer isn't going to land a contract to play in the Shield like an Aus player is going to in England.