You can’t sanction someone because people can’t batCongratulations Australia but I've had enough of green mambas and 2 or 3 day tests. Also lazy groundsmen who can't produce a test wicket and then justify their crap blaming the batsmen not making a game of it. It would be good to see the pitch sanctioned and the "greenkeeper" sacked as an example.
That is the right game. They played 4 seamers, and it was as pace-friendly a pitch as you will get in Sri Lanka, and more importantly couldn't have been more different from the pitches prepared for the Tests.Half out of curiosity and half out of wanting to prove you're pulling **** out of your backside as usual, I looked up the tour game.
SL-XI vs AUS Cricket Scorecard, Tour Match at Colombo, July 18 - 20, 2016
Get cricket scorecard of Tour Match, SL-XI vs AUS, Australia tour of Sri Lanka 2016 at P Saravanamuttu Stadium, Colombo dated July 18 - 20, 2016.www.espncricinfo.com
O'Keefe took a 10fer and SL played two spinners in Jayasuriya and Chaturanga. I didn't follow the game like you apparently did, but that seems like a strange scorecard for a supposed greentop. I want to give you the benefit of the doubt so I'll apologize if this isn't the game you're thinking of. It actually seems like SL gave Australia a very good primer of what to expect in the tests.
No . Are you having agenda against Aus Team ?Below average pitch?
I am actually.No . Are you having agenda against Aus Team ?
No , I refuse to believe you because you are a very bad poster.That is the right game. They played 4 seamers, and it was as pace-friendly a pitch as you will get in Sri Lanka, and more importantly couldn't have been more different from the pitches prepared for the Tests.
To be fair to you I can see why this wouldn't be clear to you by just looking at the scorecard, and the captain of the Sri Lankan XI side didn't quite stick with the official plan by bowling a lot of overs from the 2 spin bowlers they did have, who were both considered to be all-rounders rather than specialist bowlers at the time IIRC.
Stop trying so hard to prove me wrong lol. I know a lot more about Australia cricket tours than you do
Current evidence seems to suggest the oppositeNo , I refuse to believe you because you are a very bad poster.
Imagine an idiot saying you can't sanction someone because people can't bowl after that Melbourne debacle ...You can’t sanction someone because people can’t bat
Kallis and Gilly, both in very different ways.Imagine an idiot saying you can't sanction someone because people can't bowl after that Melbourne debacle ...
14 wickets just fell for a little over 100. When do you sanction? Who could bat on that?
From what I recall, it was the net wickets which were green not the practice game pitchHalf out of curiosity and half out of wanting to prove you're pulling **** out of your backside as usual, I looked up the tour game.
SL-XI vs AUS Cricket Scorecard, Tour Match at Colombo, July 18 - 20, 2016
Get cricket scorecard of Tour Match, SL-XI vs AUS, Australia tour of Sri Lanka 2016 at P Saravanamuttu Stadium, Colombo dated July 18 - 20, 2016.www.espncricinfo.com
O'Keefe took a 10fer and SL played two spinners in Jayasuriya and Chaturanga. I didn't follow the game like you apparently did, but that seems like a strange scorecard for a supposed greentop. I want to give you the benefit of the doubt so I'll apologize if this isn't the game you're thinking of. It actually seems like SL gave Australia a very good primer of what to expect in the tests.
It was both. Even a lazy look at the scorecard would show that. More than half the overs bowled by seamers compared to the Tests which would have been closer to 10%, if that.From what I recall, it was the net wickets which were green not the practice game pitch
Could be wrong
Yeah I think the complaint about the tour game was actually the selection of the host team (no specialist spinners), not the pitch. Seems like it turned plenty.From what I recall, it was the net wickets which were green not the practice game pitch
Could be wrong
you're also beign quite ****y while I'm being more polite
Ah yes the classic goading people into calling out your **** while maintaining a facade of politeness.some people seemed to have a very hard time grasping what the term means
You clearly haven't been following the discussion. I envy you thatAh yes the classic goading people into calling out your **** while maintaining a facade of politeness.
I'm just trying to stir **** up because salty pitch discourse is very very funYou clearly haven't been following the discussion. I envy you that