• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia vs South Africa -2022/3

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Congratulations Australia but I've had enough of green mambas and 2 or 3 day tests. Also lazy groundsmen who can't produce a test wicket and then justify their crap blaming the batsmen not making a game of it. It would be good to see the pitch sanctioned and the "greenkeeper" sacked as an example.
You can’t sanction someone because people can’t bat
 

Test fan

U19 Captain
India won ahemdabad test by 10 wickets chasing 60 off runs .But here 35-4 which include 19 runs (highest of the inning) from extra tells clear story .
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Half out of curiosity and half out of wanting to prove you're pulling **** out of your backside as usual, I looked up the tour game.


O'Keefe took a 10fer and SL played two spinners in Jayasuriya and Chaturanga. I didn't follow the game like you apparently did, but that seems like a strange scorecard for a supposed greentop. I want to give you the benefit of the doubt so I'll apologize if this isn't the game you're thinking of. It actually seems like SL gave Australia a very good primer of what to expect in the tests.
That is the right game. They played 4 seamers, and it was as pace-friendly a pitch as you will get in Sri Lanka, and more importantly couldn't have been more different from the pitches prepared for the Tests.

To be fair to you I can see why this wouldn't be clear to you by just looking at the scorecard, and the captain of the Sri Lankan XI side didn't quite stick with the official plan by bowling a lot of overs from the 2 spin bowlers they did have, who were both considered to be all-rounders rather than specialist bowlers at the time IIRC. But that doesn't change any of the facts.

Stop trying so hard to prove me wrong lol. I know a lot more about Australia cricket tours than you do
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That is the right game. They played 4 seamers, and it was as pace-friendly a pitch as you will get in Sri Lanka, and more importantly couldn't have been more different from the pitches prepared for the Tests.

To be fair to you I can see why this wouldn't be clear to you by just looking at the scorecard, and the captain of the Sri Lankan XI side didn't quite stick with the official plan by bowling a lot of overs from the 2 spin bowlers they did have, who were both considered to be all-rounders rather than specialist bowlers at the time IIRC.

Stop trying so hard to prove me wrong lol. I know a lot more about Australia cricket tours than you do
No , I refuse to believe you because you are a very bad poster.
 

Gob

International Coach
Half out of curiosity and half out of wanting to prove you're pulling **** out of your backside as usual, I looked up the tour game.


O'Keefe took a 10fer and SL played two spinners in Jayasuriya and Chaturanga. I didn't follow the game like you apparently did, but that seems like a strange scorecard for a supposed greentop. I want to give you the benefit of the doubt so I'll apologize if this isn't the game you're thinking of. It actually seems like SL gave Australia a very good primer of what to expect in the tests.
From what I recall, it was the net wickets which were green not the practice game pitch

Could be wrong
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
@OverratedSanity

To be clear, I don't necessarily have a problem with home teams doctoring wickets. I don't think it's dishonest, or against the spirit of the game or anything like that. I only brought it the SL tour up as an example because some people seemed to have a very hard time grasping what the term means
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
From what I recall, it was the net wickets which were green not the practice game pitch

Could be wrong
It was both. Even a lazy look at the scorecard would show that. More than half the overs bowled by seamers compared to the Tests which would have been closer to 10%, if that.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
From what I recall, it was the net wickets which were green not the practice game pitch

Could be wrong
Yeah I think the complaint about the tour game was actually the selection of the host team (no specialist spinners), not the pitch. Seems like it turned plenty.
 

artvandalay

State Vice-Captain
The Pindi pitch was also bad and got a below average rating which was at the other extreme. That's fair considering 'poor' is not just about how easy it is to bat.
 

Top