Yep, the thing with Imran's batting is his stats are always great on statsguru and yet no one really remembers his batting. Tells you all you need to know why its laughable that he will make the top 6 of "every other team" of the era.I mean, he acquitted himself pretty well the rest of the era...
View attachment 33002
btw, as often with Imran stats, I did not realise just how amazing it was until statsguru'ng.
Imran would make most sides in the 80s as a pure bat at no.6 IMO.
hmmYep, the thing with Imran's batting is his stats are always great on statsguru and yet no one really remembers his batting. Tells you all you need to know why its laughable that he will make the top 6 of "every other team" of the era.
Let me put it this way, his batting stats are like Kallis' bowling stats. And the discrepancy of the 80s Pak home unpiring should be considered quite heavily. Its very interesting how much of it is put to discredit Miandad and yet Imran gets a free pass for it?hmm
If Imran averages 10 less, he still makes most 80s sides surely - that's accounting for a massive discrepancy.
>is literally better away than at homeAnd the discrepancy of the 80s Pak home umpiring should be considered quite heavily.
This is what I thought when I voted (for Imran, marginally, on the basis of primaries), but they're probs slightly better.Let me put it this way, his batting stats are like Kallis' bowling stats.
The point is that he was already considered good enough to play solo as a bat. Pretty much every side in that era, WI aside, had an Imran level or worse batsman in their top six.I am sure 1 year of international cricket in that era was enough evidence he was a better batsman than the top 6 of every other team.
Because even though he was consistent he didn't have a lot of high scoring knocks as he batted 6/7 and his own style of play wasn't the most eye catching like Botham and Kapil.Yep, the thing with Imran's batting is his stats are always great on statsguru and yet no one really remembers his batting. Tells you all you need to know why its laughable that he will make the top 6 of "every other team" of the era.
You really can look at those stats and say he wasn't good enough to make the top 6, knowing how weak some of those other middle orders were?Yep, the thing with Imran's batting is his stats are always great on statsguru and yet no one really remembers his batting. Tells you all you need to know why its laughable that he will make the top 6 of "every other team" of the era.
Did Kallis ever play purely as a bowler?Let me put it this way, his batting stats are like Kallis' bowling stats.
Inane stupid question, that continues to confirm you extreme bias on this subject... why would Kallis ever play just as a bowler. The fact you can sometimes bat when you can't bowl does not imply that when injured you can bowl and not bat!Did Kallis ever play purely as a bowler?
Many matches comparatively few runs - good average --- just like Ravindra Jadeja these days ---- what average has Jadeja been sustaining in last few years ---- how do you rate Jadeja as a Batsman? How does he fair in comparison with rest of the top batsmen in world reading his batting average alone?I mean, he acquitted himself pretty well the rest of the era...
View attachment 33002
btw, as often with Imran stats, I did not realise just how amazing it was until statsguru'ng.
Yup. Happens alwaysbtw, as often with Imran stats, I did not realise just how amazing it was until statsguru'ng.
Just like to draw everyone’s attention to TOTAB’s numbers away from home across nearly 50 tests during that decade.>is literally better away than at home
View attachment 33004
He's really good, isn't he.
This is what I thought when I voted (for Imran, marginally, on the basis of primaries), but they're probs slightly better.
Sorry meant to say would Kallis have been able to be selected as a bowler assuming he couldn't batInane stupid question, that continues to confirm you extreme bias on this subject... why would Kallis ever play just as a bowler. The fact you can sometimes bat when you can't bowl does not imply that when injured you can bowl and not bat!
How about asking this question, when the main bowlers for SA got injured did Kallis ever open the bowling and do well?
Mohinder Amarnath's stats. Almost 68 away from home and under 30 at home>is literally better away than at home
View attachment 33004
He's really good, isn't he.
This is what I thought when I voted (for Imran, marginally, on the basis of primaries), but they're probs slightly better.
hey? Kallis won matches. He probably won more than Imran. And they both got man of the match awards at the rate of 1 in 8 (kallis slightly better). This comment is purely subjective. How can you tell who won the match. If the other bowlers did not take any wickets, Imran would have won none of those matches. If the other batsmen did not make any runs he would have own of those games.A major fact being ignored is that Imran actually won matches.
I don’t understand this line of questioning. Jadeja is the best bat in the world so…Many matches comparatively few runs - good average --- just like Ravindra Jadeja these days ---- what average has Jadeja been sustaining in last few years ---- how do you rate Jadeja as a Batsman? How does he fair in comparison with rest of the top batsmen in world reading his batting average alone?