• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Is Ashwin an ATG spinner / player?

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Lol, knew this would still be going. He's 35, still gets benched at the sight of grass and he isn't going to get time to show any better. He's not an ATG, no matter how hard you push the narrative.

I'd have time for the argument if he actually played, but he doesn't does he. You can't blame it all on Kohli - Ashwin has been sitting on the sideline in SENA his whole career. If your like for like is getting picked ahead of you when one must be cut, you're not great.
Ashwin played 3 out of 4 matches in Australia until he got injured along with the whole team. Where do you get the idea he has been sitting on sidelines?
 

Xix2565

International Regular
if you can't see the issues with your own statements here, and i think you can because i like to believe you have at least enough brain activity to keep your lungs functioning, then im afraid i can't really help you and will leave you to it.

Southee averaged 23 in India before this game btw. That's lower than Ashwin's career average on unhelpful decks for a tall real bowler.
You can't even help yourself buddy, if you're making braindead comments and degenerating so fast in 6 pages about a spinner.

Southee was still **** when he couldn't handle the conditions. Not exactly the greatest case for always picking the best no matter what if most of your stock is useless on a decent track. Also, ignoring that Virat's exclusion of Ashwin at times has been questioned quite a bit is really being disingenuous.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Ashwin played 3 out of 4 matches in Australia until he got injured along with the whole team. Where do you get the idea he has been sitting on sidelines?
Games in Australia: 10 (because they play each other so often I'm genuinely unsure if this is all his opportunities or not)
Games in England: 7 (solid average tbf)
Games in SA: 3
Games in NZ: 1

India have toured SA and NZ at least twice during his time.

He's your classic ATVG cricketer. There's nothing wrong with it at all, but he ain't great. Great players bolster the squad, not require depth for their own replacement.
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
Lol, knew this would still be going. He's 35, still gets benched at the sight of grass and he isn't going to get time to show any better. He's not an ATG, no matter how hard you push the narrative.

I'd have time for the argument if he actually played, but he doesn't does he. You can't blame it all on Kohli - Ashwin has been sitting on the sideline in SENA his whole career. If your like for like is getting picked ahead of you when one must be cut, you're not great.
I get your line of main argument but Jadeja/Ashwin aren’t really like for like.

Jadeja doesn’t get picked because he’s a better spinner. He gets picked because he’s a better all rounder, one who can spin (or dart) the ball.
And is a better bat (but Ashwin has picked up again).
And is a better fielder (than basically everyone).

Like I said we’ll never know but based on the above there is a chance Kohli wouldn’t even have picked Murali in the recent England series over Jadeja. But he would have picked Warne over Jadeja.
 

Xix2565

International Regular
I get your line of main argument but Jadeja/Ashwin aren’t really like for like.

Jadeja doesn’t get picked because he’s a better spinner. He gets picked because he’s a better all rounder, one who can spin (or dart) the ball.
And is a better bat (but Ashwin has picked up again).
And is a better fielder (than basically everyone).

Like I said we’ll never know but based on the above there is a chance Kohli wouldn’t even have picked Murali in the recent England series over Jadeja. But he would have picked Warne over Jadeja.
It's barely a legible string of words, let alone an argument that Ashwin isn't a great just because India has the luxury and capacity to go with Jadeja + 4 quicks. Might as well **** on anyone for being bad away in any circumstances, like Warne or Murali.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
Ashwin is in many ways the Waqar Younis of spin bowling, or here or thereabouts. Waqar had an unreal strike rate for a quick bowler for his era and could be unstoppable in some conditions. Same goes for Ashwin, great strike rate for a spinner and could run through lineups in favorable conditions.

Both have similar holes in their career. Waqar couldn't get it right in Australia or India. Ashwin hasn't in South Africa but has put up good performances in Australia though his overall record there is not that good. He could improve them though, given chances.

Ashwin certainly is a better cricketer than Waqar, given he could bat really well and could make significant series changing contributions. And that makes him an ATG cricketer imo, though it is arguable if he is an ATG spinner.
Ashwin's away average is 31. Waqar's away average is 25. Waqar is an ATG pacer without any qualifications IMO.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Ashwin's away average is 31. Waqar's away average is 25. Waqar is an ATG pacer without any qualifications IMO.
it's also not a fair comparison imo. ashwin isn't picked for the job waqar is, and pacers are flat out just better.
 

karan_fromthestands

State Captain
I get your line of main argument but Jadeja/Ashwin aren’t really like for like.

Jadeja doesn’t get picked because he’s a better spinner. He gets picked because he’s a better all rounder, one who can spin (or dart) the ball.
And is a better bat (but Ashwin has picked up again).
And is a better fielder (than basically everyone).

Like I said we’ll never know but based on the above there is a chance Kohli wouldn’t even have picked Murali in the recent England series over Jadeja. But he would have picked Warne over Jadeja.
You never know with Kohli.
 

Coronis

International Coach
So the main argument in this thread is the dropping overseas. Well, during his career (I’m unsure how long it was until he was established), India has played 56 matches in SENA countries. Ashwin on the other hand has played 20. With a current test career of 81 matches, take from that what you will.

Mother of all "he is dropped !".


Guess the cricketer ?
Yes he failed in his first test like all the other Aussies so they wanted to try someone new, one test in isn’t the same as being consistently dropped over your career.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ashwin's away average is 31. Waqar's away average is 25. Waqar is an ATG pacer without any qualifications IMO.
Yeah I dont think Ashwin belongs in any conversation with Waqar, pretty disrespectful that they're considered remotely similar. If Waqar is considered a low tier ATG (that's wrong but whatever), then Ashwin is a long way away.

Add in his batting and he's closer to ATG status than people think imo, but as a pure bowler, nah. Mostly just a limitation of being a finger spinner imo. And when you narrow it down to just that discipline, Laker is the only one clearly greater. Those are still pretty lofty heights.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I dont think there is any hesitation in calling him an ATG if he can play a successful role in South Africa and then England later on away from home. NZ may forever be a question mark but I feel he will do well there too as long as the support is there. He went ok even in the first test before KJ got onto us. To me, he is a great on the verge of ATG ness as a bowler alone. And as a cricketer, he is very much an ATG, no matter how much the usual salty suspects cry here.
 

Top