Bumrush’s absence will help Young to sleep better, though Sharma could still pose a pretty serious threat to his gargantuan pads.Young is a better stand-in than most of the openers we've had over the last two decades - we know he doesn't like that corridor of uncertainty/lbwness if there's seam movement around, but there may or may not be in India. How he'll go against spin in India is anyone's guess - I usually have zero expectation for any first-time batting tourist of the subcontinent.
Probably the best chance the kiwis have ever had to win a test series in India.I see that India have rested a bunch of their players from the series including Pant, Bumrah, Rohit and Shami.
This is a huge opportunity for NZ. I really hope we get our preparation right because we have the team to cause an upset.
Our C sides are not their weakness. They are our strength.Maybe India is hoping that NZ might also have Australia's weakness against C sides. Big disrespect. I hope new Zealand crush them.
Probably, that's it. India has been good recently for new guys starting well.Our C sides are not their weakness. They are our strength.
Injured, has been since the England tour. Was supposed to make a comeback recently but haven't heard anything.As for Indian squad, still a very formidable one. Agarwal, KL, Pujara, Gill, Rahane, Saha, Jadeja, Ashwin, Axar/Jayant, Ishant Sharma, Umesh Yadav/Siraj is quite a good side in home conditions. Whatever happened to Sundar? He was sensational in Aussie. The lad can bat and bowl.
Impossible to justify not playing one of Wagner or Jamieson.Obvious choice.
I'd actually have Mitchell in the 11. 2 seamers, Ajaz + Sommerville, with Mitch at 6 bowling up to 10 overs of mediums per day.
These are three of the absolute best bowlers in the world. Yes, conditions matter. But all three of them have shown propensity to be adaptable, and while Jamieson might be less proven, surely he's more proven than any of our spinners.Pretty sure we’ll be playing two spinners and two of Southee/Wagner/Jamieson though