Nah Rahul's shot is really quite bad IMO. It's just a shot you never ever play in that situation unless you are 1000% confident that you can play it technically flawlessly in this conditions - and especially at this ground.I think both are not criminal or anything and they were good balls and following good setups but I just think you expect more out of an opener and a #3 at the international level. Like I said, its hard to shake off the feeling that they were a bit complacent and/or over-confident after the last win. Hopefully that bubble has been burst now and the rest can put their heads down and make a score.
My feeling is that 90% of the time when a side wins the toss and bats first, you expect a minimum of 300. Anything less than that is a win for the opposition. Similarly when you put in an opposition, I feel the mark is 200-250. Anything more, the other side is the winner from that decision.
Samehahahahahaha
Hmm, he might not have time...Rohit will eclipse Sehwag as a test opener before it's all said and done
It’s not a crack field mateRohit Sharma is, by a distance, the best player of the moving ball in this lineup.
Prove me wrong.
nah. don't see him getting two triple tons and a 290 oddRohit will eclipse Sehwag as a test opener before it's all said and done
epic bantzView attachment 28996
checks out
Yes that's the point. Its depressing.It’s not a crack field mate
This feels a lot like than Manchester test in 2014 where India were 6-4 or something. Batsmen just aren't up to handling this kind of bowling.I know at 26/3 it's very easy to say.......but the decision to bat here is just incredibly dumb.
Cloudy sky's in Leeds aside, why the **** wouldn't India keep the foot on the throat and throw the under pressure English line-up straight back under the cosh? Our bowlers are good enough to feel they can make amends for that horror show at Lords........I bet the batsmen don't.