• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The Inaugural World Test Championship

Flem274*

123/5
the indian trolls lack the confidence and swagger of an australian. they really want us to buy what theyre saying.

maybe it stems from being so new to any kind of sporting success. nz has the all blacks, numerous olympic gold, now the cricket team.

india has...niche sport field hockey and two minutes of a cricket team who dont rely on dustbowls.

and nz have the recent head to head form.

sit boys, no ones buying ya chat.
 

Flem274*

123/5
What you perhaps meant to type was, ''it isn't happening *again* anytime soon''. Because it has already happened.

OTOH, if you typed, ''NZ winning a series in India ain't happening anytime soon'', then you won't suffer the indignity of being corrected.
ah yes, peak indian batting and zaheer won 1-0 against daniel flynn, jeetan patel and james franklin on motorways before scraping past the same side 1-0 in india. you must be so proud. much chest beat, so tough
 

Moss

International Captain
Here's the Monga piece referred to earlier in the thread. Mostly well argued, and even if the tone gets self-congratulatory at times India's performances over the last two series affords it - far better to publish it now than just before the final which would've seemed like bad form. The number players unearthed over the last couple of years, nay series, has been staggering.

Will maintain though that NZ are worthy finalists (which doesn't seem to be the prevailing opinion among cricket followers in my circle in India), they've built up a solid record after being complete shambles 10 years ago (that was a time I clearly remember when the idea of a 2-tier system was mooted, the same fans who were clamouring for it then would do well to acknowledge NZ's advance since then). They haven't *always* had the rub of the green either in the last 2 years - the 1-0 win at home vs England in 2019 was not part of the WTC for whatever reason, and the tour to Bangladesh last year was called off.

 

Shady Slim

International Coach
helpful joke for those wishing to engage in the thread without ruffling too many feathers;

"india? but i don't even know 'er!"
 

Apex Predator

State Vice-Captain
Man some of NZ guys really are desperate ROFL All blacks Olympic Golds in a cricket discussion:lol:..
Honestly 5th richest country should be doing a lot better
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Here's the Monga piece referred to earlier in the thread. Mostly well argued, and even if the tone gets self-congratulatory at times India's performances over the last two series affords it - far better to publish it now than just before the final which would've seemed like bad form. The number players unearthed over the last couple of years, nay series, has been staggering.

Will maintain though that NZ are worthy finalists (which doesn't seem to be the prevailing opinion among cricket followers in my circle in India), they've built up a solid record after being complete shambles 10 years ago (that was a time I clearly remember when the idea of a 2-tier system was mooted, the same fans who were clamouring for it then would do well to acknowledge NZ's advance since then). They haven't *always* had the rub of the green either in the last 2 years - the 1-0 win at home vs England in 2019 was not part of the WTC for whatever reason, and the tour to Bangladesh last year was called off.

I think NZ are definitely worthy finalists, but they're also probably not in the best 2 teams in the world. If that makes sense.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
NZ by a country mile. It is a bloodbath more often than not
In the past 40 years the home:away record of the two teams is very similar. India with a slight edge in that they've been a bit more likely to scrape their way to draws.

NZ in India: played 19, won 1, lost 10, drawn 8
India in NZ: played 16, won 1, lost 7, drawn 8
 

Flem274*

123/5
this is massive chat from the rich kids no one likes because they threaten to take their bat and ball home every time the deck has a blade of grass. or they're asked to clean their filthy shoes.
 

Flem274*

123/5
I think NZ are definitely worthy finalists, but they're also probably not in the best 2 teams in the world. If that makes sense.
nope. at very worst nz are #2 in the world.

im guessing you're thinking aus since i don't think anyone else is in the conversation (maybe england? geez that's a hard case to make tbh), but nz tour slightly better than aus. won our uae games, haven't dropped tests in bangladesh of all places, taken half the meagre opportunities england give us over there.

aus have the head to head but fortunately cricket exists outside india-aus-nz and thank **** for that or it'd just be called rock-paper-scissors until you ***** ruined it and lost to a C team at home containing shardul thakur ffs surrender your test status already.
 

Moss

International Captain
In the past 40 years the home:away record of the two teams is very similar. India with a slight edge in that they've been a bit more likely to scrape their way to draws.

NZ in India: played 19, won 1, lost 10, drawn 8
India in NZ: played 16, won 1, lost 7, drawn 8
NZ were actually very respectable in India during the Fleming and Vettori eras (1999-2010), several hard-fought draws there and a few in which they gave India a scare. Since then then it’s been one way traffic save for that Bangalore test in which Southee took a seven wicket haul. Unlikely to change this year though both Latham and Kane have the game to succeed.
 

Top