Prince EWS
Global Moderator
I don't really support the WTC concept as it is, but I kind of love the idea of the Lords final. Moving it from there would just make even less interested in it.
With Covid, you couldn't have it at Lord's though could you?I don't really support the WTC concept as it is, but I kind of love the idea of the Lords final. Moving it from there would just make even less interested in it.
They can play in UAE.This may not even go ahead though
Any update you have?This may not even go ahead though
Well as it stands the kohinoor thieves are barred from entering the country aren't they? It will probably change down the road but idk.Any update you have?
In which case they’d need a 2-1 scoreline here.This may not even go ahead though
Yep, if NZ lose the 2nd test they’d be stuck with a .6 average. 1-0 would mean a .63 average. In either scenario I think the only way for NZ to qualify is if Australia lose the current series v India and then get beaten by South Africa (will require at least a 2-0 defeat if NZ lose to Pakistan).Totally agree. But if it's Australia v NZ, would rather it be at the Basin Reserve. Perhaps because of Covid, whoever finishes 1 has their choice of destination.
I assume this is subject to a 2-0 NZ series win though. Do you know what needs to happen if it finished 1-0 or 1-1?
Thanks for thatYep, if NZ lose the 2nd test they’d be stuck with a .6 average. 1-0 would mean a .63 average. In either scenario I think the only way for NZ to qualify is if Australia lose the current series v India and then get beaten by South Africa (will require at least a 2-0 defeat if NZ lose to Pakistan).
I think it gives a lot more meaning to the Test game. Kane Williamson said post-match that his reasoning for the sporting declaration was to go for the win required for the Test Championship points. I wonder if it wasn't for the championship, whether he might have batted a bit longer to ensure they didn't lose.Doesn't even feel like a Championship, just another glorified version of bilateral fixtures.
If the idea is to play a championship, I'd be more in favour of having 2 groups where each team play each other within the group and whoever top the groups play the final. At the moment it makes no sense how the bilaterals are played randomly without any form of structure or logic and play a final at the end as an afterthought.Thanks for that
I think it gives a lot more meaning to the Test game. Kane Williamson said post-match that his reasoning for the sporting declaration was to go for the win required for the Test Championship points. I wonder if it wasn't for the championship, whether he might have batted a bit longer to ensure they didn't lose.
It started off pretty cleanly IMO (copied below from Wikipedia), but Covid of course happened and that went out the window.If the idea is to play a championship, I'd be more in favour of having 2 groups where each team play each other within the group and whoever top the groups play the final. At the moment it makes no sense how the bilaterals are played randomly without any form of structure or logic and play a final at the end as an afterthought.
Aus vs Ind (4) | Aus v SA (3) | Ind vs Eng (4) |
3-1 | 1-2 | 4-0 |
2-1 | 1-0 or 2-1 | 4-0 |
2-2 | 2-1 | 3-1 |
1-2 | 2-0 | 2-0 or 3-1 |
1-3 | 3-0 | 2-2 |
Aus vs Ind (4) | Aus v SA (3) | Ind vs Eng (4) |
2-1 | 1-0 or 2-1 | 4-0 |
1-1 | 2-1 | 3-0 |
1-2 | 2-0 | 2-0 or 3-1 |
Table updated aboveWhat if Gabba is drawn?
Please check your calculation again.Table updated above
Thanks, amended it now to 3-0Please check your calculation again.
According to my Calculation, Ind needs to win ENG series 3-0 if they draw Gabba test