Flem274*
123/5
i'll say it again, it's very easy to see why this nz side is particularly bad. heaps of the squad are from a northern districts side that came dead last at the nationals. that doesn't mean they don't have good players in their squad, but if they have 6 of the best 15 how come they sucked?
who'd have thought picking your worst players results in the worst team? the winners of the tournament (auckland) have only 4 out of the 15.
the selectors were head coach paul wiseman, graeme aldridge and adam miles. they should never be given any sort of selection role ever again. it reeks of the feedback former new zealand A coach grant bradburn was giving mike hesson "i know the other spinners took all the wickets but ish sodhi who got smashed was the best spinner i promise"
new zealands talent identification has been consistently parochial and generally really really bad since at least the 1990s canterbury mafia. gary stead himself was the beneficiary of test caps for all cantabs.
who'd have thought picking your worst players results in the worst team? the winners of the tournament (auckland) have only 4 out of the 15.
the selectors were head coach paul wiseman, graeme aldridge and adam miles. they should never be given any sort of selection role ever again. it reeks of the feedback former new zealand A coach grant bradburn was giving mike hesson "i know the other spinners took all the wickets but ish sodhi who got smashed was the best spinner i promise"
new zealands talent identification has been consistently parochial and generally really really bad since at least the 1990s canterbury mafia. gary stead himself was the beneficiary of test caps for all cantabs.
Last edited: