Shri
Mr. Glass
And only 6 byes conceded. He's getting better. Probably worked on keeping to Bumrah's weird angles.6 catches for pant.
And only 6 byes conceded. He's getting better. Probably worked on keeping to Bumrah's weird angles.6 catches for pant.
Maybe that's why he does it. He's much more capable against that stuff, as uncomfortable as it is, than full bowling on off.This is the problem with talking **** when you're a bowler. /you get bouncers at your throat.
Its a very Alpha thing to do tbhMaybe that's why he does it. He's much more capable against that stuff, as uncomfortable as it is, than full bowling on off.
Successfully trolling bowlers into bowling to his strength, WAG.
Nah, it's Beta male stuff. Should be facing up to his weaknesses and overcoming them like a real Alpha wouldIts a very Alpha thing to do tbh
Even by my standards this is silly.I just hope we can keep Australia's lead to under a 100 from here
Always thought of Ashwin as a slightly better version of Kumble in the first half of his career. One thing Kumble has over Ash is his performance Down Under and Pakistan in 2003-04. Ashwin is reaching the same stage of his career. If he could repeat something similar to those 2 performances, he will definitely be India's best ever matchwinner.O yes lots of people calling Ashwin a 'fat bastard' or similar for pages after pages here was totally justified, and I am at fault for taking objection to that!
The hypocrisy is absolutely real here, and it's not about one Indian player vs another but rather one Indian batsman vs one Indian spinner. Ashwin is the world's best spinner today and India's best match-winner of probably all-time. The kind of flak he gets from all Indian posters here (except Shri and myself) is not meted out to ANY Indian batsman.
Those 2 Shami wickets came out of nowhere. He never looked like taking one. If he gets a hat-trick now, nothing like it.Even by my standards this is silly.
EDIT: Yes it is easy for me to say in hindsight. But it was still only 8/230-odd at that point.
Shami is just weird like that. Sometimes has world class spells where he's really unlucky and goes wicketless. Then he'll come back and bowl filth and get a 4ferThose 2 Shami wickets came out of nowhere. He never looked like taking one. If he gets a hat-trick now, nothing like it.
Sriram says: All the talk of tail wagging...India and Australia were both 127/6 and from there on India got a 15 run lead...Not so bad for a tail that can't bat
Yes. Merv Hughes once took a hat-trick in 3 separate overs (in 2 different innings)In the same test match in different innings.
It's a hattrick?
Oh thanks.Yes. Merv Hughes once took a hat-trick in 3 separate overs (in 2 different innings)
The fact that Walsh is not one of his wickets is a minor victory for Walsh.Hughes' hattrick, for those wondering how it worked:
Merv Hughes
Australia v West Indies, Perth, 1988
A little known fact about the unusual hat-trick of Merv Hughes against the West Indies in 1988 - which was split over two innings - is that Windies quick Courtney Walsh had achieved the same feat just two weeks earlier, becoming the first man in Test history to take a hat-trick over two innings.
But Merv's effort was even more unusual as it was not only spread over two innings, but three overs as well.
Having dismissed Curtly Ambrose with the last ball of his 36th over in the West Indies' first innings, Hughes removed Patrick Patterson with the first ball of his next over to end the innings.
Merv Hughes
Then, more than a day later, Hughes trapped Gordon Greenidge in front with his first ball of the Windies' second innings to make it three wickets in three balls.
It was such an unusual feat, that the man himself didn't even realise until later on that he'd become just the 18th man to take a Test hat-trick.