To be honest I think Burns not playing for England from game one of the series is probably a gentleman’s agreement between England and Surrey seeing as Burns has the Surrey captaincy.I hope you're right. But we don't have the strength in depth to fully compensate for losing Burns, Curran and Pope. Maybe England will lend a hand by continuing not to pick Curran.
Really England need to look at bringing in Burns and Curran for the next game. Honestly Foakes could easily replace Bairstow and Curran in for Buttler. Burns for Jennings.
It’s getting so stacked with Surrey players though at that point and they are likely to have a gentleman’s agreement I think not to do that. I may well be wrong though at this stage of the series a gentleman’s agreement may go out the window. With India threatening to turn the series on its head.