Yeah he's busy. It doesn't mean anything that he wasn't selected, this wasn't an A side, more of an "emerging talents" side with a couple of more experienced players in it. If it was a genuine 2nd XI I doubt any of the players in this side would be there, maybe Bancroft.Any reason Lynn wasn't chosen outside of the usual?
CPL, possibly. They've generally opted against calling guys back from overseas for the A tour.
I hoped that was the case but hadn't read anything from CA saying it was an emerging talents side. However looking at the names more it seams reasonable. ThanksYeah he's busy. It doesn't mean anything that he wasn't selected, this wasn't an A side, more of an "emerging talents" side with a couple of more experienced players in it. If it was a genuine 2nd XI I doubt any of the players in this side would be there, maybe Bancroft.
Very surprising that these Aussies have been so competitive, let alone winning, against a pretty strong SA line-up with genuine Test players in it. Kind of not sure how excited to feel though because I would be surprised if Worrall, Mennie or Tremain really got close to a national call-up any time soon. They're a long way back in the pecking order.Australian pacers too good for Saffers today
Only with a lot of injuries you'd think. Selectors have already shown a preference for the likes of Bird, Faulkner, Coulter-Nile, Pattinson, Hastings, Cummins, ?Siddle etc. as back-ups for Starc & Hazlewood. Even Sayers & Fekete were in recent national squads but they could have fallen back in the pecking order.Can see Mennie, Worrall and Tremain getting a run in the OD team at some point.
Mennie the obvious replacement for Boland.
I'm not saying you're wrong but this would be really depressing; none of them are even remotely good white ball bowlers at the moment. I'm pretty sure they all average 40+ in List A cricket. They should all be high up on the list of possible Test reserves in case of injury but I wouldn't like to see them in the ODI rotation.Can see Mennie, Worrall and Tremain getting a run in the OD team at some point.
Aus selectors do have a recent history of picking players in a form of the game they're not the best at based on their performances in a form of the game the are good at but are then not selected inI'm not saying you're wrong but this would be really depressing; none of them are even remotely good white ball bowlers at the moment. I'm pretty sure they all average 40+ in List A cricket. They should all be high up on the list of possible Test reserves in case of injury but I wouldn't like to see them in the ODI rotation.
Yeah, that's why I think he's not necessarily wrong. It'd just be a really bad idea IMO.Aus selectors do have a recent history of picking players in a form of the game they're not the best at based on their performances in a form of the game the are good at but are then not selected in