One that I saw - Bracewell at fine leg off Warner IIRC. Was a top-edged hook, if Bracewell was right on the boundary he should have been able to catch it above head height and keep his balance; as it was he was a couple of metres in and had to jump to try and reach it, got both hands to it but palmed it over the boundary for six.Expected to wake up to a heavy scoreboard but damn. Kiwis rekt. How many drops were there other than the BJ Uzi one?
He didn't even palm it, it went straight between his hands, barely clipping his thumbs along the way. Was awful.One that I saw - Bracewell at fine leg off Warner IIRC. Was a top-edged hook, if Bracewell was right on the boundary he should have been able to catch it above head height and keep his balance; as it was he was a couple of metres in and had to jump to try and reach it, got both hands to it but palmed it over the boundary for six.
I hear the sentiment, but we knew we couldn't go to Australia without him and win. I don't blame management one bit for selecting him. He got through overs for ND, took 5 (didn't he?) although as Kip said, got boofed by Wellington's lower order. As that quote said in the media, he'd never had 3 months off for injury before, he'd never had a back injury. He didn't know how it would feel over time. I bet he thought it would be fine in Australia and he'd charge in. It hasn't, he's been nervous. No blame necessary for mine, just bad timing.Yeah someone here said if it wasn't Boult he would not be in contention for the 2nd test last week and I agree. I understand why you gamble on him, but they got the call wrong and this is what management are paid good money to do is to get it right. He is an absolute passenger at the moment,
IF there's ever an Usman Khawaja Test tons DVDs, this one will be ruined by Healy's god awful calling of it. There's a theory that Paul McCartney died and they replaced him with someone who looked like him, and that must've happened with Healy. No way the guy talking played 100 Tests.They're being less obviously buffoonish thus far, no pizza discussions thus far and more actual cricket. Healy and Slater are still annoying as ****, though.
This is the same management team that decided that bringing Neesham over was a good idea.If there were any doubts about his fitness and they still selected him then it's terrible management. Save him for the return series.
He broke his back when he was 19 mate, was out of the game for nigh on two years.I hear the sentiment, but we knew we couldn't go to Australia without him and win. I don't blame management one bit for selecting him. He got through overs for ND, took 5 (didn't he?) although as Kip said, got boofed by Wellington's lower order. As that quote said in the media, he'd never had 3 months off for injury before, he'd never had a back injury. He didn't know how it would feel over time. I bet he thought it would be fine in Australia and he'd charge in. It hasn't, he's been nervous. No blame necessary for mine, just bad timing.
I'm not at all happy with how we've bowled but sometimes you get on a flat one and great batsmen chew you up. Hopefully we'll learn how to bowl in these situations and be ready for Australia later in the summer.
I'm reserving judgment.Have a look at his one about NZ. Classy guy.
EDIT: seriously can't think the account is real.
Gooch 700 something vs IndiaWhat's the record for runs scored in a 3 Test series.
what cricket fan doesn't know Bradman's 29 centuries in 56 tests statistic off by heart thowtf Bradman-2.76
52 tests..what cricket fan doesn't know Bradman's 29 centuries in 56 tests statistic off by heart tho
His 100s/innings ratio can't be that shocking