• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** New Zealand in Australia 2015

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Result- Australia 2-1
Leading run scorer- Smith
Leading wicket taker- Boult
Surprise package- Burns
Biggest Failure- Taylor
Surprise dropping- Voges
 

Moss

International Captain
Result- Australia 2-1
Leading run scorer- Smith
Leading wicket taker- Starc
Surprise package- Latham
Biggest Failure- McCullum
Surprise dropping- Neesham
 

Gob

International Coach
Result-Estraya 3-0
Leading run scorer-Smitteh
Leading wicket taker-Starceh
Surprise package-Usman
Biggest failure-Williamson
Surprise dropping-Williamson
 

Jezroy

State Captain
I hope we "make ''em grovel", but I can see some pretty hard work for NZ here. I think they'll have their moments, but Australia at home are still a worrying prospect. That said, if we can get to that Adelaide test at 1-1, I think that could be quite a lottery.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah I think this is probably the reason he's been picked over Siddle.

From a selection process standpoint it makes almost no sense to drop Haze for the fifth Test in England and then recall him one Test later for the same player he was dropped for, particularly given how well Siddle bowled, but I do think they've made the right call here. Just more likely to win with Haze playing IMO, and that should really be the first and last rule of selection.
makes perfect sense to me. When he was "dropped" he was an exhausted bowler who'd been playing non-stop for months and the 5th Ashes test was in unfamiliar conditions that didn't suit his bowling style, whereas Siddle was fresh and experienced in/more suited to the English conditions.

None of those factors are relevant now and the Gabba is about as perfect as conditions get for Hazlewood's bowling. Siddle is unlucky, he'd do a great job if selected and would still probably be one of the best Test bowlers in the world but the selectors haven't gone with him here and I guess it's just because they feel they can't leave the other bowlers out at this stage,

I feel like I'm missing something...I don't see what Haze has that will trouble Williamson more than Siddle? Especially going off his bowling in the Ashes.
Yeah you're missing a lot. Firstly, Hazlewood actually bowled ok in the Ashes, far from his best though and he was exhausted for most of the series. secondly, Gabba conditions, simply a better bowler than Siddle at this stage etc etc

pretty much everything i said above
 
Last edited:

cnerd123

likes this
Being a better bowler doesnt translate to being vastly better equipped to dismiss Williamson. I like Hendrix's and PEWS's technical explanations better.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Some final thoughts I actually believe before I miss most of tomorrow's play.

It's strange, I was more pesssimistic going into the UAE and England tours, especially England, but other kiwi fans were very optimistic about that tour. Anderson and Broad on home turf worried me a lot more than Australia do now, because England pre-series had/have a much more powerful looking batting unit to back up the bowling.

I'm confident. In 2011 NZ took a test from them despite being a team who loses to the West Indies and almost Zimbabwe. Now NZ are a lot better. Australia gain an arm and a leg at home, but they're beatable, especially this new look team. If NZ were hosting a more experienced Australia with only Williamson and Taylor as proven test batsmen everyone including myself would predict 3-0 to Australia, so really New Zealand should win this. I appear alone on that though. Fair enough.

New Zealand could do worse than trolling Australia into a macho pissing contest and then proceeding with Plan A. Short bowling will land a few hits and if Johnson regains his home Ashes form then no one in the world can stand against him, but this New Zealand team doesn't play like most of the Old Zealands'. They're more comfortable against spin and pace and bounce than full swing bowling, which is why I feared for them in England.

The quietness about Southee makes me happy since I'm predicting a big series for him. Boult has improved with the old ball and the UAE was the beginning of him as an all round bowler, but Southee entered the top five pace bowlers in the world because he evolved from a pure swing bowler to a bowler who used the channel, the crease and his variations to get his wickets and make the big middle order breakthroughs during overs 40-70. He's a bit wayward since the lol7fer but Australia suits him more than it does Boult.

On that Smith bloke, if anyone is to consistently get him early I think it could be Dougeh. Dougeh struggles with being slightly too short and wide sometimes, but to Smith that's the perfect channel. If Doug has that problem again then I hope it gains that cheeky bonus.

If I had to choose one key batsman for Australia to get rid of then it's Watling. The man is a God. He did what he could with the rabble in South Africa, he worked two miracles at the Basin 12 months apart, drove the West Indies mad and set up the win against England with his second innings ton. Williamson, McCullum etc got the headlines (Mark Nicholas wrote an entire feature on a McCullum 50 against England...) but Watling was the driving force. His innings have changed almost every series he has played in since taking the gloves. It doesn't matter if you nick off Kane, Ross, Baz, Latham, Gup, Neesh....Watling will create a miracle. Australia have to keep him to single digit scores 6 out of 6.

Khawaja has to show up. Burns is "allowed" to be tidy and see off the new ball for starts, but Khawaja's test career has been Daniel Flynn without Flynn's ability to last 100 balls. If he's going to be at #3 then he can't be leaving Australia at 2 for nothing because no matter how many pictures of Steve Smith people post he is not going to score 200 6 times in a row. Voges needs runs too, but I rate him so I think he will make some contributions. Maybe not enough to stave off the daggers for players over 35 but given a chance he will support Warner and Smith.

I think the newer Australian batsmen should be given license to go after Craig at the start of his spell. If Craig gets in two quiet overs he usually bowls really well but if he doesn't it's long hops galore. That's a leaky valve they've got to force open.

I think Brisbane will be what we'd expect from these two sides - a pace bowling and expansive batting dominated contest. I'm writing the WACA off for New Zealand because of not only Johnson doing it on his own but also Lyon getting some help and Craig being murdered when he drops short.

Speaking of dropping short, Craig, Starc and Bracewell all have this habit and whoever minimises that crap the most will get a big helping hand since it will release all the pressure built up by the world class bowlers.

At Adelaide I think we'll all get trolled after getting hard ons for hooping swing. Craig will finish the series like he finishes every test series (with a massive bag) and Lyon will get a haul too with a Guptill ton (during the day ofc).

Australia - don't make it a pissing contest, don't sledge Taylor, Williamson or Watling because you'll only make them better, kill Watling with a beamer and get after Craig.

New Zealand - don't let the spuds score runs, be really nice to Australia to make them uncomfortable and crap, and beamer Johnson before the WACA.

2-1 New Zealand. Might get on 3-0 NZ at the TAB.
 
Last edited:

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Being a better bowler doesnt translate to being vastly better equipped to dismiss Williamson. I like Hendrix's and PEWS's technical explanations better.
Didn't realise I was repeating other responses. But yeah, he's pretty much better in every way than Siddle, taller, more bounce hence why i said Gabba suits him. Probably more accurate and moves the ball more than Siddle as well. Siddle's a great bowler but Haze is a class above.

So yeah, being better in pretty much every way, in conditions that suit your specific attributes, tends to translate to being better equipped lol
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Result - TIED GAME (1-1)
Leading run scorer - Williamson
Leading wicket taker - Boult
Surprise package - Latham
Biggest failure - Warner
Surprise dropping - Marsh
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
The five test series will end 2-2 with NZ holding the Trans Tasman trophy at the end of it.
 

Flem274*

123/5
I disagree with almost all of Phlegms analysis but share his optimism.
no you don't, i've seen you say similar things in the past.

and you've been bloody miserable in this thread with the gambhiring. pull ur head in and try ur best ok? do it for dingdong.
 

Top