Excellent as Boult has been in the last 18 months or so, it really comes down to how well he and Southee bowl in tandem (which is why Southee averaging 42 in the last 1 year is a slightly misleading stat - he's helped create a lot of those opportunities for Boult).Yeah unless Boult fires every single innings that's super unlikely.
Bounce+away movement. He's the perfect bowler to bowl to Williamson in Australian conditions and exploit that mistake he makes sometimes with that back foot cover drive of his. He doesn't do it as often anymore and when he does it seems a lot more controlled, but it's basically the worst possible shot to play in Australia and if anyone's going to make you pay for it it'll be a tall bowler who decks it away off the seam.I feel like I'm missing something...I don't see what Haze has that will trouble Williamson more than Siddle? Especially going off his bowling in the Ashes.
And Starc in Adelaide. These two sides have seen bugger-all of each other since the last test series in 2011, so who knows really.You'd have to worry about Johnson at Brisbane too.
TBF they're probably just worried you'll just forfeit 2 days into the first Test.Avatar bet you Aussie ****s
I'd say NZ have a better partnership with the ball but the individual parts Australia have are more capable of knocking us over. They may not compliment each other as well but they have both venom and variety.Both sides are just as prone IMO but NZ are more likely to recover from a collapse than Australia; or at least, recover better - even if Australia's tail is damn good.
Weak.TBF they're probably just worried you'll just forfeit 2 days into the first Test.