Yeah, equally as daft but they don't lay claim to being our best batsman. And at the moment, nor does Taylor.there would be your answer for why he averages 46.
and did you see rudds and baz in the first innings?
That's pretty funny because I basically treated you two as the exact same person in my mind for years until you made a post saying you were "basically a libertarian". That made you special.I agree with everything straw man says. Ever.
Latham batting well lately has spoiled you. This is par for the course when it comes to New Zealand openers.Catching up on the match via the thread and we go from none down to Taylor out?!
WHAT!!That's pretty funny because I basically treated you two as the exact same person in my mind for years until you made a post saying you were "basically a libertarian". That made you special.
No, you're silly.WHAT!!
Libertarians are silly ftr
The bad light was such a blessing for NZ. Williamson and McCullum were really struggling against Holder and if the Windies had a short spell from Roach and/or Taylor at the end there I would've backed them to take a wicket.Good day for NZ means at the end of Day 3 things are completely even. I love Test cricket, it has been great entertainment as it usually is at Kensington.
Can't help but feel we let NZ off the hook this evening. The bowlers apart from Benn looked pretty damn good and the fielders let them down. Ramdin's keeping has deteriorated awfully since he got the captaincy. That lazy footwork is unacceptable and could potentially cost us the test.
Pleased with Holder and Roach's work. Can't believe how much better this bowling attack is when compared to the one they selected for NZ. It's like chalk and cheese.
I agree with everything straw man says. Ever.
Libertarians are silly ftr
Contradiction!!!BeeGee said:Honestly, I don't use it, but I'm basically a libertarian and believe that people should be free to make their own decisions (as long as it doesn't harm others).
ToucheBeegee might agree that he is (basically) silly