ohnoitsyou
International Regular
The thing is Narine doesn't look like a test quality spinner IMO, gun in LO though.
Simile of the week, IMO.he was running in with about as much intent as a fat man coerced by his family into a New Year's pledge to exercise more.
Hmmm, not sure that I'd be at all comfortable with Neesham batting at 6 in test cricket, even if his all round numbers this season (averaging 56 with the bat and 21 with the ball) are pretty sensational. Watling would have to move up and bat at 6 imo.
Yeah, Watling's capable of batting 6 anyway. It's a good selection imo. I'm glad they haven't gone for someone like Ellis.Hmmm, not sure that I'd be at all comfortable with Neesham batting at 6 in test cricket, even if his all round numbers this season (averaging 56 with the bat and 21 with the ball) are pretty sensational. Watling would have to move up and bat at 6 imo.
Hmmm, not sure that I'd be at all comfortable with Neesham batting at 6 in test cricket, even if his all round numbers this season (averaging 56 with the bat and 21 with the ball) are pretty sensational. Watling would have to move up and bat at 6 imo.
It's a good selection because I like Neesham but I do wonder if Ryder had been considered since he's available for the ODIs after Christmas anyway?Yeah, Watling's capable of batting 6 anyway. It's a good selection imo. I'm glad they haven't gone for someone like Ellis.
With Sodhi being a young legspinner and Wagner beening Wagner, yesIt's a good selection because I like Neesham but I do wonder if Ryder had been considered since he's available for the ODIs after Christmas anyway?
Is Hesson always going to want to play an all rounder in the top six?
Basically, if they don't get Vettori back for the India series, one of McCullum or Ryder won't play.With Sodhi being a young legspinner and Wagner beening Wagner, yes
So Ryder won't play.Basically, if they don't get Vettori back for the India series, one of McCullum or Ryder won't play.
yeah, I mean, we've gone over it a few times already haven't we? The other outside option mentioned is that they pick 4 seamers + Ryder + Williamson, but we've heard "We're picking a team for 5 days rather than the first day" numerous times from Baz so I'm not sure how likely that is to occur.So Ryder won't play.
Really? he certainly looked test quality to me when he faced NZ at home!!..i guess we'll have to see how he develops over the next 12 months as he's gonna be the main man again now Shilly has been banned!!...Permaul is also interesting!..he's taken 2 or more wickets in every innings he's bowled thus far...just needs to add a few more tricks up his sleeve and i think he'll be good too.The thing is Narine doesn't look like a test quality spinner IMO, gun in LO though.
Watling should bat ahead of Anderson anyway IMO.Hmmm, not sure that I'd be at all comfortable with Neesham batting at 6 in test cricket, even if his all round numbers this season (averaging 56 with the bat and 21 with the ball) are pretty sensational. Watling would have to move up and bat at 6 imo.
From what I've seen on him, he doesn't spin the ball significantly so he won't gain much turn unless the pitch is a turner and he isn't big on flight. All he is going for him is being unreadable. Of course you have seen a lot more of him than me, so correct me if am wrong.Really? he certainly looked test quality to me when he faced NZ at home!!..i guess we'll have to see how he develops over the next 12 months as he's gonna be the main man again now Shilly has been banned!!...Permaul is also interesting!..he's taken 2 or more wickets in every innings he's bowled thus far...just needs to add a few more tricks up his sleeve and i think he'll be good too.
Lets not joke about these things.IMO they missed a trick, a fourth seamer could have been bought in for Sodhi and Devcich could then be used as a specialist spinner at 7.
Narine actually puts a lot on the ball despite not really looking like he will; he certainly gets enough turn when the pitch is at all receptive to it. His main problem is the fact that he doesn't put any body into his bowling at all - he basically just wanders up and delivers it chest on - which means he doesn't get any drift or drop; he's never really going to beat a good batsman in the air.From what I've seen on him, he doesn't spin the ball significantly so he won't gain much turn unless the pitch is a turner and he isn't big on flight. All he is going for him is being unreadable. Of course you have seen a lot more of him than me, so correct me if am wrong.
lol.Hopefully some common sense prevails. He's not Herath.
…idgi?lol.
Just a theory on this - and I may be completely off the mark - but perhaps you can't get the traditional off-spinner's body shape when you bowl the carrom ball so regularly. Neither Ashwin, Mendis nor Narine - who are the three I can think of who bowl in that 'style', for lack of a better term, drive through the crease in nearly the same way to Nathan Lyon. It seems to me like bowling the deliveries that are flicked out of the fingers wouldn't be aided at all by having the traditional shape of an off-spinner's action.His main problem is the fact that he doesn't put any body into his bowling at all - he basically just wanders up and delivers it chest on - which means he doesn't get any drift or drop; he's never really going to beat a good batsman in the air.