, if Swann wanted in he'd have forced the issue, but nah, he just hid away at slip with his hands in his pockets!!!.....
Well Swann not coming on worked didn't it? Or was that another doctoring tactic that was designed to screw the poor innocent and hapless West Indies side over?So when Smith was on fire and your team was behind Swann hiding was acceptable just because the ball isn't old enough? i've heard it all now!!
We may not have won a test series but we DID draw with the same pak side that just whitewashed a certain team!!......
Yes there was, the ropes were moved back to make the boundrie hard to make, and i just told you we played India not long ago and they were confident in their own abilities, no need for any "extras"
.
Don't forget the first ever flat track seen in ODI cricket.
Yes India never doctor their pitches.Yes there was, the ropes were moved back to make the boundrie hard to make, and i just told you we played India not long ago and they were confident in their own abilities, no need for any "extras"
Pretty sure I've heard it all now. Pathetic argument tbh.
Nah no doctoring, the skipper obviously didn't have enough confidence in the "best spinner in the world" on that road!!...yet people wanna question Narine!!Well Swann not coming on worked didn't it? Or was that another doctoring tactic that was designed to screw the poor innocent and hapless West Indies side over?
Not in our series they didn't!!!.. i guess because they were the higher ranked team they were confident!!.. unlike other teams!!Yes India never doctor their pitches.
.
Or maybe he thought he'd by more effective early on. FFS you could argue Jayawardene doesn't have confidence in Malinga because he occasionally holds a lot of his overs back for the end of the innings.Nah no doctoring, the skipper obviously didn't have enough confidence in the "best spinner in the world" on that road!!...yet people wanna question Narine!!
Don't try and put words in peoples mouths please!!.. thats what toddlers do.
You didn't think they doctored conditions because Indian conditions are similar to West Indies conditions. While on the contrary you do think England doctored conditions because they weren't the same as what you'd see in WI. Face it, we had the ropes back where they should be, and prepared a flat pitch. Don't see anything too new about that, unless I'm missing something.Not in our series they didn't!!!.. i guess because they were the higher ranked team they were confident!!.. unlike other teams!!
Just four overs proves my case, went for seven runs in his first over then Cook decided he'd seen enough!!
, then brought him back when the game was virtually over, like i said it looks like the skipper's lost faith in Swanny!!..
Yeah, don't put words in peoples mouths, it's not what mature individuals do, if you aren't a mature individual then pardon me!!, my mistake!!.
And that one over happened to be the last over before the powerplay. And then when the powerplay ended, the seamers were taking wickets. Why would he take them off when they're taking wickets and winning his side the game.Just four overs proves my case, went for seven runs in his first over then Cook decided he'd seen enough!!
India weren't moving ropes back!!.. therefore they didn't doctor anything, and how the hell are the likes of Kensington Oval and Sabina park similar to India conditions?
i don't think so.
I had a full six years of legal training yet I'd still struggle to construct this sort of superficially compelling argument as well has been done here. I am impressed.
No but they designed grounds that had small outfields. Clearly a cowardly move to dumbfound players from other nations.India weren't moving ropes back!!.. therefore they didn't doctor anything, and how the hell are the likes of Kensington Oval and Sabina park similar to India conditions?