Migara
International Coach
I know. But these guys running through SL middle order in three days twice with regularity is overblown.these guys are seriously exciting prospects. could be anything
I know. But these guys running through SL middle order in three days twice with regularity is overblown.these guys are seriously exciting prospects. could be anything
No; not at all. I've had this conversation with Spark many times. The aversion to using one's feet other than when hitting over the top is a huge part of it.Is that only my self thinking that there has been a drop in spin playing standards?
I think you're taking it a little far with points like this though. You don't have to have a lot of unorthodox mystery about you to be a good spinner; orthodox methods have such broad appeal to bowlers because, funnily enough, they will work if you can execute them to elite standards. Swann is a good Test bowler and I firmly believe that with more experience - particularly in terms of workload - Lyon will be of a similar vintage. Test cricket never has and never will just be about presenting something beyond convention; there's a huge place in the game for the man who perfects the traditional arts.in late 90s, bowler like Swann wouldn't have had this success I feel. generally any orthodox finger spinner was played with ease in that era.
..
When some body mentiones Lyon being a good spinner I cannot help thinking along above lines.
No-one was actually saying they would, though. It was an example to show that what people were saying about Narine based on little to no useful evidence was unfounded.I know. But these guys running through SL middle order in three days twice with regularity is overblown.
with his recent performance he's up to 60.00% of his wickets being tailenders ftr. I would also say he's looking good for best number 11 ever, particularly given his one duck so far came batting at 9I reckon Lyon will become a quality bowler in time tbh. One because he has such a good action, gets good natural drop and turn, but also because he has guts, more so than most spinners I've seen in recent years. Always a good thing in a spinner, and in a cricketer in general.
and with this post the chances of lyon taking 7/50 in the next test with 5 top order wickets just shot up tenfoldwith his recent performance he's up to 60.00% of his wickets being tailenders ftr. I would also say he's looking good for best number 11 ever, particularly given his one duck so far came batting at 9
#BowlerBasher
tbf i've made that point like 5 times now and i'm also now saying it as a joke to piss PEWS off. i can't lose.and with this post the chances of lyon taking 7/50 in the next test with 5 top order wickets just shot up tenfold
As did the chances of him bagging a pair.and with this post the chances of lyon taking 7/50 in the next test with 5 top order wickets just shot up tenfold
West Indies could have done with a bowler who could take a tailend wicket in the first innings tbf.with his recent performance he's up to 60.00% of his wickets being tailenders ftr. I would also say he's looking good for best number 11 ever, particularly given his one duck so far came batting at 9
#BowlerBasher
if he has to go for 0/100 off 10 overs to avoid a pair then damnit he's going for 0/100As did the chances of him bagging a pair.
tbf I think the chances are related to how much effort spikey puts into the prediction.As did the chances of him bagging a pair.
ftfyie a 1 liner like "watson will get 50 and out" happens every time anyway...
God/PEWSbot clearly wants me to stick to humourtbf I think the chances are related to how much effort spikey puts into the prediction.
ie a 1 liner like "watson will get 50 and out" is short enough so likely to come true.
But a 4 page essay written with passion, and citing facts is guaranteed to be immediately and embarrasingly proven wrong.
If you haven't been watching WI over the past 18 months? yes, but hey you support England and we all know your lot done much better than us against Ajmal and co didn't they? .Answer to both questions is the same though.
Erm Narine was the best spinner and top two bowler overall in the last champions league which was in IN INDIA!! , his West Indies debut wasn't bad either which was also in India!!...
Australian spinners have struggled but I'm yet to see where the WI spinners have done anything at all outside the WI's.
Relevance to Tests?Erm Narine was the best spinner and top two bowler overall in the last champions league which was in IN INDIA!! , his West Indies debut wasn't bad either which was also in India!!..
Imo the guy just doesn't have enough tricks up his sleeve to be effective against the best teams, sure he may learn in the future but when i saw Narine and him on the same pitch the other day the difference in class was massive, and Narine is younger than him!! , Swann always had star quality but just couldn't settle down in his younger days, i don't see Lyon reaching that level to be honest.I think you're taking it a little far with points like this though. You don't have to have a lot of unorthodox mystery about you to be a good spinner; orthodox methods have such broad appeal to bowlers because, funnily enough, they will work if you can execute them to elite standards. Swann is a good Test bowler and I firmly believe that with more experience - particularly in terms of workload - Lyon will be of a similar vintage. Test cricket never has and never will just be about presenting something beyond convention; there's a huge place in the game for the man who perfects the traditional arts.