four_or_six
Cricketer Of The Year
I don't mind if there's an overwhelming reason to go four quicks, or two spinners. I just don't like the shades of grey around the choice of seamer.I see what you mean, but I'm of the other opinion. What you call "chopping and changing" I see as flexibility.
We've seen the crims make the mistake of picking four quicks on decks likely to take a bit of turn in both the last Ashes series (The Oval & The MCG) because it'd worked on notoriously seam friendly pitches in the previous games (Headingley & The WACA). Same principle in the UAE for me; if Onions is more likely to take wickets he should get the nod. But equally at Lords in May Finn or Tremmers might be the shout.
Monty would be my call tho.
Monty would be great, I'd love to see him back in. But can we really do it without going five bowlers? I dunno.